Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BP2

Leo mentions on his web site that he had more time to help Cort with his case so it may be a better case. He also said Cort’s case was cleaner in CT lower courts. The judge in NJ’s lower courts changed the paperwork after the fact to try to derail Leo’s case. Leo is not sure if this harmed his case but obviously that the was th NJ judges intent.

There may also be some hope becase Scalia has Cort’s case and apears to be carefully reviewing it. I am not saying Thomas did not review Leo’s but Leo has detected some differences in the way it may have been handled by the clerks or something.


422 posted on 12/08/2008 9:56:42 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: Frantzie
There may also be some hope becase Scalia has Cort’s case and apears to be carefully reviewing it. I am not saying Thomas did not review Leo’s but Leo has detected some differences in the way it may have been handled by the clerks or something.

Yes, possibly Scalia and Thomas got together and decided Wrotnowski case is better for the reasons that Donofrio listed.

546 posted on 12/08/2008 11:24:32 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson