Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Congressman Billybob

For decades in obscenity cases, a four-Justice minority would file sometimes lengthy dissents, ending with the correct point that they could have forced the Court to hear the case.
***Something about that just strikes me as ridiculously crass. I’ll bet no one knows why they didn’t just force the court to hear it. They felt strongly but not strongly enough, just like today. They sometimes act more like politicians than supreme court justices, and our constitutional republic suffers because of it.


323 posted on 12/08/2008 9:07:28 AM PST by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo
The four dissenting Justices in the obscenity cases DID force the Court to take several cases, which all lost by identical 5-4 votes. Finally, the 4 resorted to filing dissents, rather than forcing more cases to be heard.

It wasn't politics. It was practicality. As Einstein remarked, it is foolish to keep repeating what you've done before, expecting the outcome to be different.

John / Billybob

386 posted on 12/08/2008 9:39:23 AM PST by Congressman Billybob (Larest book: www.AmericasOwnersManual.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson