Replies

The majority elected him, and a very large part of those who did not vote for him would find it distasteful and childish to go back and try to “undo” an election. And that’s precisely how it would be viewed, as “undoing” a “legal” election. The public absolutely won’t stand for it.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I believe that you disregard what the public will stand for. It always stands for truth, and Obama has spent a million bucks to obfuscate his social record and his birth place.He defended the actions asking for his birth details with the same law firm that CAIR uses.

Article II of the Constitution is there for a purpose. Its purpose is to assure the undivided loyalty of a President to the People, and the Constitution.For the first time in our nations history, we have a president who does not genuinely have that loyalty to the people or the constitution.Nor has he served in the defence of our bnation in the military, which would have mitigated that fact. And we will see where that leads perhaps, but I believe that it will result in untold tragedy for all Americans, and immense suffering regardless of what one's politics might be for people at home, and for people abroad who are not Americans, but who fall withn the sphere of influence of the United States.

There are consequences to snubbing the guidance of our Founding Fathers, but the self-centered baby boomer generation has never considered such consequences of any real import, its all just selfish fluff and fantasy feel good Utopian dream.Wake up is about to happen,BIG TIME.

We now will be asked to abandon our individual freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, or modify them out of existence. Jonah Golberg has written extensively about it and predicted it.

Much worse is to come.

The country will now divide itself in to those who wish to reamin free, and those who want to become enslaved.

The outcome of that dynnamic will decide whetner we live in peace or at war with our neighbors and our family/relatives.

Total crazy talk, Obama was born in this country by all accounts. He won the election. We will survive his presidency. Let’s get to work fixing our party. All this talk about war among Americans is just nuts. This case sought to change the definition of a natural born citizen. It was never going anywhere and shouldn’t. I would rather defeat the Democrats then play games with the constitution in order to remove Obama as president. They won, we lost-move on.

Come on. Surely you know better. If the public "always stood for truth," then the public would have demanded, ten years ago, that the U.S. Senators actually LOOK at the Starr materials that alleged that Bill Clinton was a rapist. Quite the contrary, the more it was pushed, the more angry at Republicans the public became.

There is one thing that is certain: the American voters will not be told they are stupid. I don't care what evidence you have, I don't care what the constitution says, the voters will work the system so that their will is followed. There is no circumstance under the sun in which ANY of this will result in Obama being prevented from taking office.

There are 19 lawsuits concerning Senator Obama’s eligibility to the be U.S. President. Six have made it to SCOTUS:

Phillip J. Berg PA
Leo C. Donofrio NJ - stay denied, writ still pending(?)
Chris Strunk NY
Cort Wrotnowski CT
Darrel Hunter TX
Lightfoot CA

This issue isn’t going to die anytime soon.

Donofrio has an explanation at his website stating that New Jersey state court-related issues involving his case perhaps made the Supremes decide the way they did; so he is going back to NJ courts. What the Supreme Court may be looking for is that “perfect” landmark case. Good Lord knows! They have a lot of cases to pick and choose from on this issue.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/