Taliban fighters destroy crucial Nato supplies in Pakistan.

Daily Telegraph (UK) ^ | 07 Dec 2008 | Isambard Wilkinson

[PotatoHeadMick]

As Iraq settles down Afghanistan seems to be bubbling over, I presume President Elect Obama has a solution beyond invading Pakistan.

[Doofer]

I presume President Elect Obama has a solution beyond invading Pakistan.

It'll be interesting how the Obama faced with reality responds to the real world...

[HighlyOpinionated]

This report makes me sick to my stomach. Oh No.

God protect our forces overseas, especially those in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Not those expensive HumVees!!! Terrible. Who was supposed to be guarding the supplies?

[verity]

Anyone think that A-10 Combat Air Patrols would be effective in protecting these sites?

[Flavius]

crucial supplies, are support by the established media
they never had that

that was destroyed long ago

[Yorlik803]

Security Guards were overpowered by taking a really long nap.

[CHEE]

NATO and the UN always get it right. WRONG!

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

Pakistan is sending the U.S. a message.

[70th Division]

I wonder where the gun ships were?

[JudgemAll]

Obviously they guard their culture of death over there, tying our hands.

It’s like antispanking laws, parents cannot counter the government or liberal culture of exploitation by teaching their children better. Self employment, self defense, national defense, all of this is not PC. We have to be multi cultural and pro UN homo losers.

[flowerplough]

“Let me make this clear. There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans,” Obama said.

“They are plotting to strike again . . . If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will.”

[Mouton]

I think as the islamic radicals expand their sphere of influence in an ever widing circle, it lends itself more easily to a solution by B-53 (Mk-53) High yield strategic thermonuclear bomb.

[Jet Jaguar]

Anyone think that A-10 Combat Air Patrols would be effective in protecting these sites?

Yes

[When do we get liberated?]

Attack was in Pakistan. No combat air patrols there. Heck they complain when an occassional house blows up in Waziristan

[shadowgovernment]

“Pakistan is sending the U.S. a message.”
>>>>>>.................
roger that
and our responce will be??? how about “NUTS”?

[SmokingJoe]

“destroying over 100 lorries “

Meh.
Islamic “youth” destroy more than that number of trucks and cars in France in any given week. The Taliban are a bit behind here.

[70th Division]

I agree. We need to send a message. You are for us or against us. No Pu$$y footin’ Well the only good side is America will have to build a few more Humvees LOL

[70th Division]

I agree. We need to send a message. You are for us or against us. No Pu$$y footin’ Well the only good side is America will have to build a few more Humvees LOL

[70th Division]

I agree. We need to send a message. You are for us or against us. No Pu$$y footin’ Well the only good side is America will have to build a few more Humvees LOL

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

They know that 0bama is a poseur.

There is real danger that 0bama will try to act tough without thinking through the consequences.