Another Barack Obama Birth Certificate Case Heads To U.S. Supreme Court...

RedCounty ^ | 12/7/08 | Matt Bruce

[pissant]

Press Release: Lightfoot v Bowen...

Mission Viejo, Ca. (NS/OrlyTaitz) -

Let me first start by saying I recieved a phonecall from Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz who will be in Washington, DC Monday December the 8th to file papers about her lawsuit which involves Barack Obama and his birth certificate...

On December 2nd a Petition for an extraordinary Writ of Mandamus was filed in the Supreme Court of California. This petition (as seen in the attachment) states that Mr. Obama has not proven his "natural born citizen" status and cannot be sworn as a president of the United States and the commander in Chief. There are 7 plaintiffs in this case and they include Vice Presidential candidate for Ron Paul, on the ballot in CA, Ms Gail Lightfoot, 4 electors and two registered voters...

A number of plaintiffs in this action are veterans and former servicemen, that are concerned about a prospect of Mr Obama becoming the Commander in Chief of the US army, without providing any information, as to his citizenship at birth and currently, particularly citizenship of Indonesia, Kenya and Great Britain (Kenya was a British colony in 1961, at the time of Mr. Obama's birth) without providing his immigration records, passports or even as much as the original birth certificate from Hawaii, that is supposed to show the name of the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor, that can be verified against the vital records from the hospital, Within two days of filing on Friday 12.05.08. at 9:45 PM, the Supreme court of California has issued a denial, that will allow the attorney on the case, Ms. Orly Taitz, an Application for Emergency Stay in the Supreme Court of the United States as early as Monday, the 8Th of December. The case will be reviewed by the Supreme Court Judge Anthony Kennedy...

PDF file of the petition can be found on:

http://drorly.blogspot.com/...

More information on the case will be provided at the press conference at the National Press Club in the Washington DC, to be held on 12.08.08. at 1:30 Eastern time...

Ms. Taitz is also one of two attorneys, representing Ambassador Alan Keyes et all against Ms. Bowen, CA Secretary of State et all. This case will be heard in CA Superior court prior to the Certification of votes...

(pdf file of Keyes v Bowen is also on the drorly.blogspot.com)...

Ms. Taitz has also requested that any supporters of this issue that can present at the National Press Club in Washington, DC please show up to show their support of finding out the truth once and for all about Barack Obama being 'eligible' and meeting the Constitutional requirements required to be our next President...

Orly Taitz, Esq...

26302 La Paz ste 211 Mission Viejo, Ca 92691

To hear more, including interviews about the Obama birth certificate case, go to:

http://thecaptainsamerica.com

[little jeremiah]

Somerville, MA?

[little jeremiah]

>>>This is insane. America went on a drunken stupor on NOV 4th largely fueld by the Liquor of Bush hate that the MSM has been forcing down many throats since 911. When America finally wakes up, I pray its not going to be too late to put the pieces back together.<<<

Well said. Too bad it’s too long for a tagline!

[freepersup]

I think that the Strunk suit from NY has been delivered to the SCOTUS. It hasn't made it onto the docket, as of the 5th. I read the entire filing on a blog (I can't honestly remember who's.) I'll go a googling for it momentarily. It was a little rough, but his tact is another unique angle and seems to be solid (my weak legal mind thinks so anyway.) Another pro se situation. The main claim is that wherever Strunk sought documentation to prove Obamas’ eligibility for the Presidency, he was denied. He used a FOIA request each and every time. The last place he asked for information via the FOIA, was from the U S State Department. The guy makes $200 a week as an aid in a law firm. He asked for a waiver in some of the fees, and offered to make payments to the NY court system. He pays $125 in child support a month (as a matter of record.) Some of this is anecdotal, but none the less, it made for an interesting read.

[bvw]

Well done!

[editor-surveyor]

The more, the merrier!

[freepersup]

Here’s another one!

The blog link:

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1588

Read here:

Chris Strunk NY Cases: Writs of Mandamus: SCOTUS Rule 22, DC Circuit Court
December 4th, 2008 at 9:33 pm

FreeRepublic thread on Strunk:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2144177/posts

[Deepest End]

I say, PAKISTAN did not forbid travel to Pakistan by Americans in 1981, or any other time.

If I'm wrong, I'll say so.

Go ahead and post a reference or some other CONFIRMABLE FACT that says I'm wrong.

Folks, I have seen this Pakistan "banned" travel claim bantered about countless times. I guess I hoped that since it is unverifiable that it would fade away. Time to finally chime in.

Jim Noble is correct. This issue is a non-starter.

Since the inception of Pakistan in 1947, there has never been a "ban" on travel by US citizens to or from Pakistan. There have been periods of travel "warnings" issued by the US State Department, including currently. Travel warnings do not prohibit travel, rather caution against it.

US relations with Pakistan have been severely strained at times. However, even after the burning of the US embassy in 1979, the US did not institute any embargoes or travel bans. We did remove all non-essential personnel from the embassy, but did not close it.

In June 1981 Pakistan received a military and economic aid package from the US on the condition that they not test a nuclear weapon. The US does not provide financial aid (particularly military) to countries which are embargoed or otherwise "banned".

Folks, if you have read even a few of these threads, you know I am as strong a supporter of the constitutional questions surrounding BHO's eligibility to hold the office of President as anyone. I firmly believe that it is not only appropriate, but our duty (note my tagline), to question that which is questionable. But, please do not state as fact that which you cannot verify. That only serves to dilute our position overall.

I challenge anyone to provide any verifiable documentation that there was any travel "ban" between the US and Pakistan.

If you can I will gladly eat my words and extend a sincere apology.

[freepersup]

And yet, here's another one!!!

According to an e-mail from Darrel Reece Hunter, to the blog; ‘the right side of life,’ Hunter has mailed his filing in to the SCOTUS, on Friday past, from Texas, and expects to hear something by either Monday, or Tuesday.

I'm in the middle of reading his case.

He apparently attempted to get on the ballot as a candidate in all fifty states as a replacement candidate, anticipating a replacement campaign (his words) but only succeeded in being granted access to the New Hampshire Democratic Presidential Primary. He lacked the funds to get on the ballot in all of the states, including New Hampshire. New Hampshire allowed him access to the ballot, yet the US Code (his words) denied him access, due to his lack of ‘filing fees’ ($5,000.)

He selected Brian Williams of NBC News (yes, that Brian Williams) as his VP selection, provided; Brian Williams is eligible. LOL ;O)

I'm still reading, but wanted to give a heads up to the unwashed, about this one! I may have a fact or two slightly bent, but I've given enough of an overview here, to paint the case what it is. It's rough work, and lacks a certain level of proofreading, not unlike the Strunk filing. Ex: Hunter refers to the McCain/Palin ticket as the McCain/Pulard ticket... huh?

Anyway, take a look at it if you have the time. I'm withholding a final opinion, pending a complete read (or two.) Also, Hunter made an effort to link his case with Berg and Donofrio.

Here's the link:

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?page_id=1563

[little jeremiah]

>>>Why would Barack Obama Sr. deny his son American citizenship? Do immigrants commonly have their children born in the country they fled, rather than in the Shining City on a Hill in which they aspired for themselves and their families to make a good life for generations to come?<<<

Country from which he fled? Obama Sr didn’t flee Kenya, he came the US for higher education, was an member of the elite in Kenya, and went back to enjoy whatever kind of good life Kenya had to offer.

[fstab]

Standing takes more than just being a citizen, it takes a demonstration of injury. So basically the only people with standing are candidates and electors, which is who is filing as far as I can tell.

Nobody else probably remembers this, but there was a lawsuit before the Electoral College voted in 2000 claiming Bush and Cheney both lived in Texas, so the Electoral College couldn’t vote for both of them. The Court refused to hear it on standing grounds, and also commented that separation of powers kept them from enforcing Constitutional requirements on the EC; the EC is ultimately its own judge.

And, to be frank, in 8 years this whole birth certificate stuff will probably be as forgotten as that case is now.

[FFranco]

The one thing tha bothers me is I don’t understand why ordinary citizens alledgedly do not have standing to file suit.

---

You do not understand how widespread the conspiracy is to force this Muslim Marxist on the American people. The ‘lack of standing’ issue for American citizens just prooves how involved the courts and judges are. And that people like M. Malkin are also involved in the conspiracy shows how widespread it is.

[pissant]

Excellent. Keep em coming.

[LibertyRocks]

I actually met Gail in California back in 2000. She’s a good lady. I’m glad she’s stepped up to be a plaintiff in this lawsuit.

[freekitty]

Well, how about filling us in and how M. Malkin is involved.

[beckett]

Country from which he fled? Obama Sr didn’t flee Kenya, he came the US for higher education, was an member of the elite in Kenya, and went back to enjoy whatever kind of good life Kenya had to offer.

Is there no end to the inanity?

In 1961 the United States of America dominated the world like no other power ever had, and American citizenship was far more valuable than Roman citizenship in the time of Christ. All over the earth, people were begging to come to our shores, and filled with envy of our people.

And yet for partisan purposes, denizens of Free Republic are now willing to make the entirely specious argument that in 1961 a Kenyan, lucky enough to find an education and a wife here, would choose to skip American citizenship for his son, and instead make him a citizen of a poverty-stricken British colony, where, as an "elite," the senior Obama may have owned an especially spiffy mud hut.

Like I said, the inanity just doesn't end.

[freepersup]

ROGER! Here are some more cases that are ‘headed to DC!’

Presidential eligibility/qualifications cases working their way towards the SCOTUS:

From: http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?page_id=1518

By way of: http://americamustknow.com/lawsuits.aspx

At the State level:

California:
Alan Keyes: Keyes v. Bowen (12/01/08)
AmericaMustKnow history

Joan Corbett: Corbett v. Bowen (11/16/08)
AmericaMustKnow history

Gail Lightfoot: Lightfoot v. Bowen (12/06/08)
DENIED (CA Supreme Court); being submitted to SCOTUS Associate Justice Kennedy
AmericaMustKnow history

Georgia:
Rev. Tom Terry: Terry v. Handel (11/12/08)
AmericaMustKnow history

Hawaii:
Andy Martin: Martin v. Lingle (11/26/08)
AmericaMustKnow history

Kentucky:
Daniel John Essek: Essek v. Obama (12/01/08)
AmericaMustKnow history

North Carolina:
Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan: Sullivan v. Marshall (11/28/08)
AmericaMustKnow history

Texas:
Jody Brockhausen: Brockhausen v. Andrade (11/19/08)
AmericaMustKnow history

Washington State:
James Broe Case (12/05/08)

[RegulatorCountry]

Supposed Pakistani travel restrictions are not the problem for Obama as far as presidential eligibility. The notion that he even possessed an Indonesian passport in adulthood does have some very interesting implications, though.

[little jeremiah]

I was merely pointing out that Obama Sr went back to Kenya, didn’t intend to stay here, and was a member of the elite. Elites in poor African counties, then and now, often live high on the hog.

And there is little evidence that Obama Sr ever even lived with 0bama Jr’s mother, plus he had at least two other wives in Kenya. No big deal, but let’s not create myth here.

[hoosiermama]

Pong to 177