To: STARWISE; Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; ...
I'm told by a Supreme Court watcher that the lack of an announcement doesn't mean the court definitely won't hear Donofrio although he thinks it's safe to say its unlikely the court won't hear the case. The full orders aren't due until Monday. Ping.
166 posted on
12/05/2008 2:53:51 PM PST by
LucyT
To: LucyT
That’s alright. It’s one of many cases that will head to the supreme court.
168 posted on
12/05/2008 2:55:56 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: LucyT
AAARRGGGGGHHHHHHHH! Double negatives.
...although he thinks it's safe to say its unlikely the court won't hear the case.
Is that the same as saying, "...although he thinks it's safe to say its likely the court will hear the case?"
181 posted on
12/05/2008 3:28:48 PM PST by
Beckwith
(Typical white person)
To: LucyT
191 posted on
12/05/2008 3:56:20 PM PST by
1COUNTER-MORTER-68
(THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
To: LucyT
‘it’s safe to say its unlikely the court won’t hear the case.’
Double negative, whichmeans they will hear the case?
243 posted on
12/07/2008 4:04:27 AM PST by
nikos1121
(The first black president should be another Jackie Robinson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson