[metmom]

Do they believe that Cretionism/ID is science?

It's irrelevant to the fact that the evo/lib side is suppressing the wishes of the majority through the abuse of the judiciary.

There is no justification for that.

If the evos are so concerned about teaching only science in science classes, they need to push that on its own merit outside the courtroom and convince people that way.

Forcing it on others just because evos think that they're right and that justifies the actions of litigation, is wrong. If you can't convince people that you're right, oh well, just suck it up and live with it.

[tacticalogic]

It's irrelevant to the fact that the evo/lib side is suppressing the wishes of the majority through the abuse of the judiciary.

If you submit that the majority want it taught as science, how can it be irrelevant?

[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

the evo/lib side is suppressing the wishes of the majority through the abuse of the judiciary....If the evos are so concerned about teaching only science in science classes, they need to push that on its own merit outside the courtroom

So you're admitting that Creationism/ID is not "only science"? And that you're arguing for something that isn't science to be taught in science classes because the majority wish it?