The fact that this matter is going to “conference” dooms it.
.......The fact that this matter is going to “conference” dooms it.....
I can understand the thought but do not agree.
This is a knotty constitutional issue and involves three individuals. Were it Obama alone, it might be dropped, but since there are three separate sets of facts to be sorted, they must take it up.
If they do not, there is a precedent of Calero which means Arnold can run.
.......The fact that this matter is going to “conference” dooms it.....
I can understand the thought but do not agree.
This is a knotty constitutional issue and involves three individuals. Were it Obama alone, it might be dropped, but since there are three separate sets of facts to be sorted, they must take it up.
If they do not, there is a precedent of Calero which means Arnold can run.
How so? Is this not the regular process of deciding if a case should be heard or is it an unusual step?