Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Plutarch
"Postings directed against FR favored candidates during the primaries were deleted, and many posters banned."

Correction: Many people who supported liberal causes like abortion or abortionist candidates were banned or left because FR is a conservative website and as such is staunchly pro-life, pro-God, pro-family, pro-liberty, pro-constitution, pro-limited government, pro-security, pro-defense and pro-America.

FR's entire reason for being is to promote conservative candidates and conservative causes. Liberals and moderates are shunned. Of course FR admin favors conservative candidates! Wouldn't have it any other way.

Posters who favor abortion, gay marriage, gun grabbing, restrictions on religious freedoms, open borders, etc, or favor big government, entitlements, confiscatory taxation, social engineering, weakened security or defenses, etc, or favor candidates who take these non-conservative positions are probably pretty uncomfortable here as they feel the heat of thousands of conservatives objecting to their moderate/liberal posts.

One such poster went so far as to suggest that conservatives have held their boot to the neck of the GOP for far too long and that abortion, God, guns and gays will never ever be important planks to the GOP again.

Got news for all who think this way. Eliminate any of these conservative planks and the GOP goes poof. Without traditional conservatism, the GOP means nothing. A party made up of McArnolds, McRudys and McRomneys is worthless. Just say no to big government moderate "conservatism."

The GOP is not even a fiscally conservative party anymore. And many top Republicans are now pushing global warming, gay rights, open borders, big government, big spending, etc. Suggest the party gets back to Reagan conservatism before it's too late.

96 posted on 11/19/2008 11:23:42 PM PST by Jim Robinson (We ARE the dissent, baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson
Posters who favor abortion, gay marriage, gun grabbing, restrictions on religious freedoms, open borders, etc, or favor big government, entitlements, confiscatory taxation, social engineering, weakened security or defenses, etc, or favor candidates who take these non-conservative positions are probably pretty uncomfortable here as they feel the heat of thousands of conservatives objecting to their moderate/liberal posts.

One such poster went so far as to suggest that conservatives have held their boot to the neck of the GOP for far too long and that abortion, God, guns and gays will never ever be important planks to the GOP again.

Got news for all who think this way. Eliminate any of these conservative planks and the GOP goes poof. Without traditional conservatism, the GOP means nothing. A party made up of McArnolds, McRudys and McRomneys is worthless. Just say no to big government moderate "conservatism."

Thanks for saying this Jim!

These cafeteria conservatives always want to identify themselves as "Goldwater conservatives," but what they fail to realize is that Goldwater was a COMPLETE FAILURE as a presidential candidate. Goldwater did WORSE in terms of percentage of the voters, states carried and electoral votes than Hoover did in 1932. In fact, the ONLY Republicans to do worse than Goldwater were Taft in 1912 (when he split the GOP vote with Teddy Roosevelt) and Alf Landon in 1936.

It was only when Ronald Reagan recognized the role that social issues played in conservatism that conservatism succeeded.

239 posted on 11/20/2008 5:04:11 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Thanks, Jim

:)


241 posted on 11/20/2008 5:29:37 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Are we going to have to read this kind of garbage "Oh sure, Palin will try to run with it, she is ambitious, she is willing to neglect her baby to get what she wants, that’s clear. I feel so sorry for her baby." (rodeo-mama) on FR for the next four years while the MittBots savage anyone who may threaten his ascendancy?

After what the DBM did to Palin, surely, surely FR can offer her a safe haven here?

Romney has been soundly rejected by the voters. Let the corpse of his candidacy rest in peace and let us move on with those who really DO embody conservatism. Please.

244 posted on 11/20/2008 5:36:56 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (Tagline on vacation during the grand experiment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...

Jim Robinson wrote:

FR’s entire reason for being is to promote conservative candidates and conservative causes. Liberals and moderates are shunned. Of course FR admin favors conservative candidates! Wouldn’t have it any other way.

Posters who favor abortion, gay marriage, gun grabbing, restrictions on religious freedoms, open borders, etc, or favor big government, entitlements, confiscatory taxation, social engineering, weakened security or defenses, etc, or favor candidates who take these non-conservative positions are probably pretty uncomfortable here as they feel the heat of thousands of conservatives objecting to their moderate/liberal posts.

One such poster went so far as to suggest that conservatives have held their boot to the neck of the GOP for far too long and that abortion, God, guns and gays will never ever be important planks to the GOP again.

Got news for all who think this way. Eliminate any of these conservative planks and the GOP goes poof. Without traditional conservatism, the GOP means nothing. A party made up of McArnolds, McRudys and McRomneys is worthless. Just say no to big government moderate “conservatism.”

The GOP is not even a fiscally conservative party anymore. And many top Republicans are now pushing global warming, gay rights, open borders, big government, big spending, etc. Suggest the party gets back to Reagan conservatism before it’s too late.


249 posted on 11/20/2008 5:54:47 PM PST by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

When I first started posting here, I was a Rudy supporter. I learned tons here about him and other candidates. I still think Rudy was an awesome Mayor of NYC in many ways and rocked during and after 9-11. I would have voted for him, for POTUS, with less hesitation than I did for McCain.

I didn’t know much about his position on guns, homos, abortion, etc. I knew what he did for NYC in positive ways and how he handled 9-11. I’d trust him with illegal immigration and border security and National security moreso than I would McCain. I’d trust him more for Conservative SCOTUS appointments than I would McCain.

My point, this site is filled with information many of us wouldn’t know otherwise. As long as Pro God, Pro 2nd A, Pro Life, Pro National Security, Pro border control, Pro man-woman (anti homo crap), small government, etc. remains the core, all will be well. So to speak.


289 posted on 11/20/2008 10:34:37 PM PST by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson