Skip to comments.
Cow Tax Proposal Would Threaten Agriculture Viability
Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation ^
| November 15, 2008
| unattributed
Posted on 11/18/2008 6:35:07 PM PST by prairiebreeze
With the economy in bad shape and the possibility of a deep recession looming, the Environmental Protection Agency is proposing to levy new taxeson cows and pigs, American Farm Bureau Federation Director of Regulatory Relations Rick Krause told Wyoming Farm Bureau members at their annual meeting. Krause spoke in Sheridan on Nov. 7.
This is no laughing matter, Krause said. The cow tax and the pig tax are parts of a larger scheme by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.
Under the proposal, if a state charged the presumptive minimum rate from the EPA, the cow tax would be $175 per dairy cow, $87.50 per head for beef cattle and a little more than $20 per pig, Krause explained.
(Excerpt) Read more at wyfb.org ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agriculture; cattle; climatechange; cow; cowtax; globalwarming; insanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-120 next last
Not only would a tax of this size "impose severe penalties on livestock producers", it would put many out of business.
To: prairiebreeze
Hmmmm. Sounds like just another 'gas tax' to me.
2
posted on
11/18/2008 6:37:41 PM PST
by
Viking2002
(Let's be proactive and start the impeachment NOW.)
To: prairiebreeze
Not only would a tax of this size "impose severe penalties on livestock producers", it would put many out of business.
That's the idea. Hungry people will gladly apply to their Ministry of Beef for the quota tokens, especially after hearing so many MSM stories about how private farmers were "under-regulated".
To: Viking2002
Bet PETA is behind this...
4
posted on
11/18/2008 6:38:48 PM PST
by
sionnsar
(Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
To: prairiebreeze
How does the EPA have taxing authority? I know they can levy regulations which cost, but taxes?
5
posted on
11/18/2008 6:39:36 PM PST
by
ConservativeMind
(Obama is bringing in every crook and bumbler he can to assure consistency in his message.)
To: prairiebreeze
It would also accomplish what the environazis can’t impose on us otherwise, many people would be forced to become vegetarians. For most cows that would add a 10 to 20% tax and cows are already subject to property tax yearly.
6
posted on
11/18/2008 6:40:04 PM PST
by
tiki
(True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
To: prairiebreeze
WAIT, didn’t President Bush just sign one of those “last minute” executive orders that gave Mining Cos permission to wreck havoc with mountain tops and watersheds to get at the coal?
And just where was the EPA then?
Why do I keep thinking “hell in a handbasket?”
7
posted on
11/18/2008 6:40:28 PM PST
by
HighlyOpinionated
(Psalm 66:7b "He watches every movement of the nations. Rebels will not be able to oppose Him.")
To: prairiebreeze
The cow tax and the pig tax are parts of a larger scheme by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Yeah, to impose totalitarianism and destroy America.
8
posted on
11/18/2008 6:41:05 PM PST
by
NaughtiusMaximus
(Never worry, never doubt. Run in circles, scream and shout.)
To: aWolverine
Look at how many people are employed by the Big 3 of Beef (McD, Burger King, Wendy’s) not to mention how many little shops on the corner sling burgers for a buck.
Think there may be any JOBS LOST by such a measure, Misssster Obama?
9
posted on
11/18/2008 6:41:51 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
( Our troops DESERVE BETTER than Barack Hussein Obama!!)
To: Viking2002
Ok. That did make me smile.
Haaa!
10
posted on
11/18/2008 6:43:48 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
( Our troops DESERVE BETTER than Barack Hussein Obama!!)
To: ConservativeMind
They will propose legislation to the congress, if I’m understanding your question correctly.
There was a lot of rumbling in the industry today about this. It’s not just a story, I’m told.
11
posted on
11/18/2008 6:46:18 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
( Our troops DESERVE BETTER than Barack Hussein Obama!!)
To: prairiebreeze
Nope,the price of meat would just go up to cover the tax.
12
posted on
11/18/2008 6:46:20 PM PST
by
Farmer Dean
(168 grains of instant conflict resolution)
To: prairiebreeze
I have no problem with the tax IF we equally apply the tax to imported livestock and boxed meat.
13
posted on
11/18/2008 6:47:08 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
(("In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." FDR)
To: prairiebreeze
Obama: I hate people being able to AFFORD food...
(e.g. “Let them eat cake.”)
14
posted on
11/18/2008 6:47:22 PM PST
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: prairiebreeze
When the Chinese write the “official” history of the downfall of the United States of America, the title will be:
“What the He!! Were They Thinking?”
15
posted on
11/18/2008 6:50:24 PM PST
by
henkster
(It's time for a conservative "long march through the institutions.")
To: B4Ranch
You have no problem with a tax that won’t do what it’s ostensibly sold as accomplishing? That will harm producers and make prices rise and demand decline because of it and put more money in the gubmint’s pocket??
Funny, I do.
16
posted on
11/18/2008 6:51:06 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
( Our troops DESERVE BETTER than Barack Hussein Obama!!)
To: Iowa Granny; Ladysmith; Diana in Wisconsin; JLO; sergeantdave; damncat; phantomworker; joesnuffy; ..
If you'd like to be on or off this Upper Midwest/outdoors/rural list please FR mail me. And ping me is you see articles of interest.
As a non cow/pig owner, those are some pretty stiff taxes.
17
posted on
11/18/2008 6:52:55 PM PST
by
SJackson
(http://www.jewish-history.com/emporium/)
To: prairiebreeze
I thought the government wasn't supposed to tax food. So the food is still in a living state, it's still food.
If they are taxed because they emit greenhouse gas, so do all living creatures. Do we tax ourselves for breathing, too?
-PJ
18
posted on
11/18/2008 6:54:24 PM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
(You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
To: prairiebreeze
"...the cow tax would be $175 per dairy cow, $87.50 per head for beef cattle..."
Whoah, there! Reverse those taxes, so that those with play-ranches (movie stars, other business moguls and the like--always beef) have to pay the higher tax. And get a tax on those millions of horses that are standing around and not being ridden. That should do it.
Under those conditions, the policy would not pass. It can only pass, if meat for the working class folks is taxed.
19
posted on
11/18/2008 6:54:24 PM PST
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
To: prairiebreeze
“We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK. That’s not leadership. That’s not going to happen.
Barack Obama “
Lot of Americans will go hungry
20
posted on
11/18/2008 6:55:31 PM PST
by
Lera
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-120 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson