Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jet Jaguar

When McCain lost to Bush in the 2000 primaries I recall he was quite bitter about it and for some time was prone to criticism of the Bush administration in a rather petulant manner. Yet with Obama, he’s already out there with the raching across the aisle stuff. Which party is it he really belongs in again?


15 posted on 11/17/2008 10:24:33 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pepsi_junkie

McCain has always fought against the republicans. When he won the nomination he realized that he’d have to start attacking his ‘friends’ on the other side of the aisle.

Soon after he determined that it was better to lose with honor than to fight and win the election by calling out the democrats.

Pathetic - really - but then again, not unexpected by our favorite self-centered sr senator from az.


20 posted on 11/17/2008 10:26:46 AM PST by conservative_guyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie
” Which party is it he really belongs in again?”
>>>>......
McCain was selected not elected in the primary..
the plot thickens
we all know he and the RINO Graham will stab conservative
senators in the back..
A new party is looking like the only hope as the GOP has been subverted by crooks,liberals and deviates..we been had. see my tag line. Never a McCain supporter, Palin yes.
58 posted on 11/17/2008 11:07:35 AM PST by shadowgovernment (From the Ashes of a Republican rout will raise a Conservative Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie
When McCain lost to Bush in the 2000 primaries I recall he was quite bitter about it and for some time was prone to criticism of the Bush administration in a rather petulant manner. Yet with Obama, he’s already out there with the raching across the aisle stuff. Which party is it he really belongs in again?

Perhaps this year's campaign was McCain's last stab in the back to the Republican party for dissing him in 2000.

77 posted on 11/17/2008 11:50:09 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Obama: Satan's Counterfeit Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie

“Yet with Obama, he’s already out there with the raching across the aisle stuff. Which party is it he really belongs in again?”

He belongs in the RAPP. He’s the number one hip hop rapper for the Reach Across Pimp Party.


109 posted on 11/17/2008 1:01:27 PM PST by takenoprisoner (No more rappers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie

“When McCain lost to Bush in the 2000 primaries I recall he was quite bitter about it and for some time was prone to criticism of the Bush administration in a rather petulant manner. Yet with Obama, he’s already out there with the raching across the aisle stuff. Which party is it he really belongs in again?”

To be fair, the attacks McCain had to endure in 2000 were of the highly personal nature and represented slander and character assassination (has black love child, had affairs Cindy McCain does not know about, etc.) without any shred of proof provided. Politics is a rough game, but I would imagine that being attacked in that fashion felt a lot different than what he had to hear this time around.

Not that McCain’s policies are worth a damn, I am just comparing the two different campaign cycles, and I would imagine the first one was a bit more personally damaging for McCain for a while longer because of the highly personal nature of the attacks against him.


129 posted on 11/17/2008 10:01:25 PM PST by floridagopvoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie
Well...now that you mention it, all during the campaign, McCain did criticize President Bush just about as harshly as he ever did obama.
133 posted on 11/17/2008 11:16:22 PM PST by top 2 toe red (Some names I will never, ever dignify with a Capital letter again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie
When McCain lost to Bush in the 2000 primaries I recall he was quite bitter about it and for some time was prone to criticism of the Bush administration in a rather petulant manner.

McCain was bitter about the nasty, underhanded campaign tactics in South Carolina. He had a right to be. The "black child with a New York prostitute" stories would have set anyone off. In South Carolina they didn't say "black child" and they didn't say "prostitute". The goobers took it as gospel because a lot of it was spread in the churches. I would have been pissed, too.

But what did McCain do? He turned around and campaigned for Bush. In Nevada, in Ohio and in Florida, close states where McCain was popular and Bush not so. He sucked it up and worked his heart out. For Bush. For the Party.

Remember Florida? A few hundred votes and Al Gore would have been President Gore. President Gore on 9/11. How many votes did McCain swing? Certainly hundreds, probably thousands, and possibly tens of thousands. Without McCain George W. Bush would have been fish bait.

They had policy differences and McCain did what he could to advance his own ideas in the Senate. He opposed the Farm Bill, just as he always had. He opposed the Highway Bill, just as he always had. He opposed the Pill Bill, just as he always had. Petulant? Maybe somewhat. He wasn't George W. Bush's lapdog.

136 posted on 11/18/2008 12:05:14 AM PST by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson