“Since you did not mark it as an excerpt that should mean you posted the entire article.
)What a NitPick... It’s called the dissemination of important info...(
Maybe Boulet has written other things that are better documented - unless I missed something it doesn’t document a single thing Obama has done or said since the election. It doesn’t talk about who he has chosen for key positions. Its just speculation.
)It is his statements ‘prior’ to the election. Your rationale, honestly, makes no sense...(
If the battle to restrict speech is coming we need better ammunition. Speculation is fine but we are in for a fight to protect free speech and hard nosed, honest journalism would be better.
And by the way I appreciate the article bringing up other avenues of attack on free speech we might face besides the fairness act but my principle point is that they did not back up their claim that its happening now.”
“fairness act”...nice seed...
“If”... “Speculation”?!?
Methinks doubt is being spread.
Lord Barry is well known for the ‘clearing the field of any opposition’. It is his Chicago way.
You must have swallowed the myth that the AP is “objective” or you fully understand that it is not. I am still trying to discern. The author solidly buttressed the article, or did you even follow the link to AmericanThinker.com?
It is his prior statements in re the Constitution, in his own voice. As well, it his support for the “localism” canard.
Not to mention Biden’s chilling “stay with us” comment and that Barry BOHICA will ‘have’ to do ‘something’ many will not like or want.
I addition, there have been numerous public statements, before & after the election, from Dem. Congressmen that extol the ‘virtues’ of the Fairness (censorship) Doctrine. Point of fact.
It is when you look at these events, statements, hearings, and Federal Government Docs. in their entirety, that a viscerally chilling picture forms in one’s minds eye. I’m not the only one wearing an Alcoa cap.
I guess I must have a problem taking fact from various sources and ‘surmising’ the intent of a thoroughly noob pol.
Please, do more research, then...
Bury your head in the sand, if you so choose. FReepers will not.
Past is prologue, especially in re mute Obama.
I’m happy to know you can take such comfort in his amazingly thin resume.
Doll&Jindal12
tehDeets
My first post must have been written badly - I only intended to criticize the writing of the article - not disagreeing about threat or to freedom of speech or the likelihood that that the threat is coming.