Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich says Palin will not be the future GOP leader
The Hill ^

Posted on 11/16/2008 11:40:56 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Gingrich says Palin will not be the future GOP leader By Alexander Bolton Posted: 11/16/08 01:05 PM [ET]

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) is batting down the hype that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin heads into 2012 as the frontrunner for the GOP presidential nomination.

Palin energized the Republican base after GOP presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) tapped her as his running mate and she has tried to preserve her high public profile since Election Day.

But Gingrich, an architect of the Republican revolution of 1994, took Palin down a notch, asserting that she would not become the party’s leader, as some have predicted.

“I think that she is going to be a significant player,” said Gingrich during an interview on CBS’s “Face the Nation”. “But she’s going to be one of 20 or 30 significant players. She’s not going to be the de facto leader.”

Since the defeat of the GOP ticket, Palin has pursued an aggressive media strategy, scheduling a full slate of interviews to keep her face on television.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alexanderbolton; gingrich; gop; newgop; newt; newtgingrich; palin; sarahpalin; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 361-373 next last
To: Crim
Someone turned him into a newt... No newts is good newts....

"Newt...my name's Newt. Nobody calls me Rebecca...except my brother."

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

221 posted on 11/16/2008 1:43:45 PM PST by Christian4Bush (The left-wing cancer took root in the 1960s and the funeral took place on November 4th, 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
Technically you are correct.

However Newt is a clever man. He knew how it would be portrayed in the media. It's clearly a shot at Palin.

**********************

Agreed. Only a complete idiot would not have known how his remark would be played by the MSM, particularly after the firestorm of criticism Palin has already experienced. Gingrich should have been prepared for this kind of question. I find it incomprehensible that he would not have been.

I'm disappointed in Gingrich.

222 posted on 11/16/2008 1:44:09 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Shut up, Newt. Your time is over, as is the time of the rest of the dinoRinos.


223 posted on 11/16/2008 1:45:44 PM PST by rintense (I don't wanna gain the whole world and lose my soul~ TobyMac (are you listening Obamabots?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Sigh.....


224 posted on 11/16/2008 1:46:00 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: volslover
I dunno. I don't dislike Palin, I like her values. But I don't think she is a good spokesman. Let's be honest, she rambles a lot about nothing half the time she is talking and people notice that. Sure, she's a fine example of a role model and a good conservative, but we need more than that. We need those qualities in someone who stands up and their mere presence demands respect. Palin doesn't draw that out of me, there is no power behind her. I'm not bashing or anything, I really do like her. I just don't think she is there yet. I'd like to see her rise from a true republican cabinet position or something, get a few years of hard-core insider under her belt. Build up that respect so it is solid. I'd rather try and see what Clarence Thomas can do. I really want to see Thompson give it a serious shot. There are several others, but I really don't think Palin is the one.

And as far as "the voters get to decide" ..., well, that didn't work out for us this year. Someone else picked our guy for us. I'm still trying to figure out who it was. It sure wasn't us.

Ok, flame away! I got my suit on

225 posted on 11/16/2008 1:46:29 PM PST by FunkyZero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“I think that she is going to be a significant player,” said Gingrich during an interview on CBS’s “Face the Nation”. “But she’s going to be one of 20 or 30 significant players.”

Sorry Newt, she is the number one significant player and you and the rest of your rino pals best get used to it. We are intent upon re-establishing conservatism in the Republican party. If we fail in our mission, conservatism dies a political death, and so does the GOP. So failure is not an option.

You guys shoved “reach around” McCain done our throats and we had to swallow. No more my friend...no more of this crap will we eat.


226 posted on 11/16/2008 1:51:37 PM PST by takenoprisoner (NO MORE RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

We have better and they deserve a chance. McCain doesn’t get to decide the future of the party.


227 posted on 11/16/2008 1:51:48 PM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Names?


228 posted on 11/16/2008 1:53:55 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Jindal and Sanford for starters.


229 posted on 11/16/2008 1:55:19 PM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

I agree with Jindal but he has to fight the same fight as Palin is currently fighting


230 posted on 11/16/2008 1:56:55 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: calex59

“To start with all your arguments are a little specious. You say she needs to govern. She has already governed and has doen quite well at it, as a business owner, mayor and Governor of the largest state of the Union. She has negotiated contracts with Canada and foreign oil companies and also has negotiated with Russia over fishing rights. So much for “foreign policy”. Economics, she has already proved herself there with what she has done in Alaska.”

You’re kidding, I hope. You and I know what you say is true, but that is not going to be good enough. 62 million American voters also have to believe it. She has to bone up on all the issues I mentioned. She has to spend a lot of time on public speaking skills and interview skills. That is how the game is played.

I said go back and govern well because a huge spotlight is going to shine on her the next four years. This is her opportunity to demonstrate to the masses that she is not the way she was portrayed by the MSM.


231 posted on 11/16/2008 1:57:04 PM PST by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: jaime1959
"How about we pick someone who’s smart, ARTICULATE, and conservative next time?"

Like WHO?? Anyone in mind?

There is a certain eloquence to plain-spoken, common sense politicians instead of glib, pretentious, calculated pander-speak politicians who play to the George Will/Peggy Noonan-wing of the GOP.

Truman was HARDLY "ARTICULATE:; neither was Nixon or LBJ or our 1st RINO-in-Chief, George H. Bush.

232 posted on 11/16/2008 1:57:17 PM PST by AC-130 Gunship (Odinga-Hussein 0bama: Ushering in a new Reich of hell of thru "diversity" and Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Tell me about Sanford


233 posted on 11/16/2008 1:57:31 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: FunkyZero

Thompson? Is he still alive?


234 posted on 11/16/2008 1:58:53 PM PST by Capn Nickerson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

~LOL~ because Newt has decided he is running in 2012, he practically told Hannity so last week.


235 posted on 11/16/2008 2:00:09 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

absolutely. We’ll see after the debates.


236 posted on 11/16/2008 2:00:20 PM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
"Newt is a clever man. He knew how it would be portrayed in the media. It's clearly a shot at Palin."

BINGO.

I've lost ALL respect for this one-time conservative, no-holds-barred conservative. Newt's now drifted into the Dark Side of RINO politics. His globalist NWO masters are no doubt proud of him.

Next stop for Newt: Kissing Bill Maher's @ss on his show.

237 posted on 11/16/2008 2:00:51 PM PST by AC-130 Gunship (Odinga-Hussein 0bama: Ushering in a new Reich of hell of thru "diversity" and Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
What an extraordinarily misleading headline.

Right you are. This is what Newt actually said...

I think Palin would even agree with this statement. She will help shape the future of the party.

This is just another example of how the media often divided the Republicans. Rather than jumping all over Newt, people should be incense with bias.

238 posted on 11/16/2008 2:01:03 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

An angle that hasn’t been brought up yet on this thread is what exactly will happen, both good and bad, during Barack Obama’s entire first term as POTUS and during the next 2 years and beyond of a socialistic controlled Congress? Will leftists even allow future elections to occur? Will there really be one to more “9/11’s” during Obama’s Presidency? Will too many people become “government dependents” for the rest of their lives to the point where leftists never lose their political power at any point in the future? Will amnesty for illegal immigrants as well as allowing illegals to vote in all future U.S. elections succeed in maintaining a leftist political dominance for a very long time, if not forever? Will the U.S. really become a third world socialistic country for a very long time, if not forever? Will there really be a civil war between conservatives and leftists? Will there really be a nuclear war? Will there be any kind of worldwide outbreak of some kind of terrible illness that wipes out many of the world’s people? Will Obama really become very similar politically to many of the world’s worst dictators? Can both capitalism and conservatism ever make any kind of serious comebacks at anytime in the future of the U.S.? There are too many serious questions to ask between now and ‘10, ‘12, and beyond.


239 posted on 11/16/2008 2:01:29 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (Conservatives obey the rules. Leftists cheat. Who probably has the political advantage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Gingrich says Palin will not be the future GOP leader

Sorry Newt, but, if this is still the USA and a free country, then we the people will decide who the leader of the GOP will be in the future, and, as far as I can tell, Sarah is by far the front-runner and the preferred candidate of most true conservatives.
240 posted on 11/16/2008 2:01:47 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 361-373 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson