It is not a technicality.
You don’t think it’s significant that Obama may not even be a naturalized American citizen?
A technicality? ROFL. Yes, just a minor requirement to be CIC.
ANd please be sure to ping us all for all the ‘important’ subject threads that you wish to put on the table. We anxiously await.
A technicality? Is the First Amendment a technicality also? Rules are rules. If Obie doesn’t meet the criteria to be a U.S President, then I don’t care how overwhelming his victory was. He shouldn’t be allowed to take the Oath of Office.
A ‘technicality’???? TELL me you aren’t serious.......especially if you are.
Good God in Heaven.........can’t believe I read that here on FR.
What’s wrong with you? You’re saying you want to overthrow the US Constitution. You are on the wrong forum; possibly you’re residing in the wrong country.
It's only embarrassing in that there seems to be insufficient evidence to show Obama was not born in Hawaii.
If we (America) allows Obama to be sworn in, and it is THEN proved he was not born on American soil, it will SET A PRECIDENT that will endure forever in every court of law in the land.
NO ONE WILL EVER have to validate US CITIZENSHIP to hold any job ..... any job.... which previously required US citizenship to hold.
They can simply cite US v Obama as precident... and every freakin' judge will essentially have their hands tied.
This situation is vital to the continued security of America.... maybe not in the case of Obama.... but certainly in the future of this great country where my kids and grandkids and great grandkids will hopefully live.
Whew -- where to begin?
The issue is the RULE OF LAW, and whether we are a nation of laws, or a nation of emotions, tribes, races, clans, and ancient rivalries. That is what we supposedly left behind in the 1600s with the Massachussetts Bay Colony and the Jamestown settlement, and was enshrined in our Constitution in the late 1700s and early 1800s, and has never been formally challenged without a fight.
If Martha Stewart can go to the slam for misremembering a date in her schedule when talking to a Federal investigator, and if Bill Clinton can be impeached not for having not-sex-with-that-woman, but for lying about it to Federal investigators, what makes you think an attempt to circumvent Constitutional law by someone who claimed to be a Constitutional law scholar and who will swear to uphold the Constitution for all of our sakes is no big deal? It is a very big deal, and something we absolutely cannot allow anyone to wink and ignore.
There is also a doubt that the so-called democratic election was fair, because of the obvious fakery of the ACORN people, which the Federal Election Commission is not investigating, but should.
Obama likely to escape campaign audit [Democrats break law=shrug, Republicans break law=jail]
Audit of Obama Fundraising Unlikely
Obama likely to escape campaign audit (What McCain was thinking ALERT)
Thirdly, the election is not complete, under our system, until the Electoral College casts its votes. At least one large group of electors, California, have filed suit to have proof of his eligibility before the ACTUAL election by the College, which is in December.
Who cares what the quite obviously corrupt MSM has to say? If either McCain or President Bush had questioned his eligibility, such as Bush saying he would hold off on the traditional tea and crumpets between outgoing and incoming presidents until Obama's eligibility for office was proved definitively, what are the people and the press going to say about Bush that they haven't already said for the past eight years?
If blacks and/or Democrats are smart enough to understand the rules of basketball, football and baseball, they can surely understand that no matter what the fans shout at the umpire, rules are rules and the game is not fair if the ump tips it to one team or the other. The enormously popular Pete Rose got canned over breaking the rules. Michael Vick was not excused. There are many examples of hugely popular sports stars who broke the rules and suffered the consequences, without riots in the streets.
Lastly, if the Obama-funded lefty bloggers can whip up such a storm over Palin's $150,000 of LOANED clothing and ignore Obama's $140,000 Greek amphitheater built for his one night stand at the Democratic Convention, and if they can whip up a huge fuss claiming that Palin's lipliner is tattooed while ignoring what appears to be Obama's nose-slimming surgery, then the only recourse for patriots is sticking to the truth and the rule of law, no matter what.
The birth certificate issue is part of a PATTERN of deception which includes Ayers, Wright, ACORN, Davis, Fannie Mae, Khalidi, Zeituni, Rezko, Kenyan insurgencies, foreign money, and on and on and on and on. It’s ALL related; it’s ALL relevant.
You are inverting the moral emphasis of this argument. All this speculation, correct or not; has come about because this lying crypto-marxist thug from the most corrupt environs of leftist Chicago sewer politics has ascended to POTUS-elect status with the willing aquiescence of the MSM. The MSM was hell-bent on concealing this usurper’s background because they wanted him to be elected. Now, in a classic case of blame the messenger, those of us who belive in the constitution are being reviled for insisting that a POTUS comply with a basic requirement that most of us unhesitatingly conform with when seeking a driver’s license.
The arrogance and effrontery of this lying bastid is breathtaking. The founders knew that they were not natural born citizens, so they had to include language in Art II Sec 1 that exempted THEM. Does this fraud think that he is better than Washington, Madison, Adams, and Jefferson in that sense? Apparently he does, and with the submission of enough folks who think like you, he will suceed in usurping and corrupting the Executive Branch of government. This situation presents the very real posssibility of impelling this great nation beyond a constitutional crisis toward a civil war.
Finally, consider the implications of a man who would undertake these devious machinations to knowingly assume an office that he has no constitutional claim to, and than to see this same counterfeit president elect take an oath to defend that constitution. I believe that such a man would be willing to impose ANY sort or despotism or tyranny upon us to retain power.
Saying that there questions that need be answered is not being wacko.Either you believe in the Constitution or you don't
or....
Those that “democratically” voted Opossum as presumptive-President-elect would be shown the real machine behind his “thugocracy” and (as good Americans) be fully and abjectly ^appalled^ at the way this was marketed to them.
Me thinks that even the loony left would feel played.
It is not a technicality.
Would you prefer we just toss out the rules and regulations set forth for the office of President? Seriously, WAKE UP!!!
It’s because of ideas like yours that the sheeple of this country have been “Obatamized” TM. As ironic as it can be the idea of “question authority” is being used by conservatives because of the many outright lies being spewed by the left. I’m NOT saying you are a sheeple, but to just let the aboslute fine points of anything slide is to let the entire foundation erode to nothing. We, after all is said and done, a nation of laws and we need to follow the laws in all cases.
Now go out, earn some cash so you can have almost all of it taken to make sure others have the chance to do the same later!!
PM
Constitutional requirements a technicality?
You dismiss the Constitution as irrelevant?
You sir, are unworthy of American citizenship if you truly believe the drivel you just posted.
TECHNICALITY !!!!!
You call having a Kenyan pose as an American, conceal his origins, and LIE to the nation "a TECHNICALITY"???
I call it a bar faced assault on the Constitution, A Fraud, and a Coup d'Etat by the Communist Radicals.
Don't give me "TECHNICALITY"!
People like you are undoubtedly either very stupid or trolls no matter how long you've been here.
I don't know if he was born here or not but he needs to show his BC, how much trouble could that be? McCain had to produce his at the start of the campaign due to the Dems complaining about him being born in the Canal zone. So you think republicans have to show BC but democrats don't?