So just to make the newspaper Birth Announcements issue clear:
1. It is unknown whether any record exists on microfiche.
A Freeper post from the mega 6,000+er last summer......
The only thing that admits of a response is the Vital Statistics point. The newspapers in Hawaii of the day published each day, births and deaths and marriages of the preceding 24 hours. Someone has gone through and looked at library editions of those newspapers for August 3, 1961 to learn that nowhere in the first week of August is there publication of the birth of this guy under any of the available names. His mother doesn’t appear anywhere as a mother either.
And he was born in a hospital. How many people would have been directly involved? Forty-seven years later—are they all gone or have forgotten? Nobody, not the taxi driver, the nurse, the admitting officer remembers anything? The hospital they originally named as the birth site wasn’t built until several years after the claimed birth? Obviously it has no records of his birth; neither do any of the other hospitals in the area.
If born in a hospital his birth would have been registered on that date. Not days later.
To add to your thought, there is an unconfirmed thought being conveyed from feet on the ground researchers of one of the lawsuits that a COLB would be issued with a newspaper announcement. If there is any truth to that, the announcement we are seeing may actually be from the “Hawaiian Record”. This could be why we aren’t seeing the Microfiche.
You see, a person with a lot of money and influence wrote for the Hawaiian Record. His name is Frank Davis.
But, trying to make that piece of scrap paper look like it is from he Hawaiian Advisor is good too.... :P