Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: solfour

Come on stupido jerko. Show the American people a legal certifiable birth certificate.

Wasn’t this creep vetted before he ran? What the heck is the FBI/secret service/CIA/ad nauseum doing anyway?


213 posted on 11/14/2008 9:08:56 PM PST by eleni121 (EN TOUTO NIKA!! +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: eleni121
Wasn’t this creep vetted before he ran? What the heck is the FBI/secret service/CIA/ad nauseum doing anyway?

Because of his associations, he shouldn't have even been given a security clearance! How did he get briefed without a clearance, anyway??

217 posted on 11/14/2008 9:13:28 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

To: eleni121

Someone posted weeks back that Berg had been in contact with both the FBI and the CIA.....Both had more information than he did but could only share it if they were called into court to testify. Think that might be the plan.


225 posted on 11/14/2008 9:17:37 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

To: eleni121
Wasn’t this creep vetted before he ran? What the heck is the FBI/secret service/CIA/ad nauseum doing anyway?

I think we're seeing the exposure of a mammoth hole in our election system. If I understand what I've read correctly, candidates are certified as eligible at the STATE level. And when queried on vetting of presidential candidates in California, the Secretary of State said that candidates are vetted by the PARTY. So we depend on the Democrats' honesty and diligence?

It should absolutely not be possible to become a presidential candidate without first proving eligibility, yet I believe that has clearly happened here. I believe this man is definitely not a natural-born citizen and quite possibly not a U.S. citizen AT ALL.

It should also not be possible to become a presidential candidate when you can't pass even a low-level security clearance background check, yet there is NO doubt that this has happened here. If you don't believe that, let you or I apply for a government job that requires a security clearance, and let the background check reveal that we have spent time in the company of domestic terrorists, and see if you or I get that job. My wife worked years ago for a U.S. Attorney, and the FBI was all in a dither during her background check because she once visited a man in the hospital who had ties to counterfeiting.

I'm absolutely convinced that we have the most stupendous example imaginable of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing. Or to put it more accurately, what the right hand is NOT doing. It's nobody's official job to see the proof of citizenship, so it just doesn't get seen. It's nobody's job to say, "Hey, we couldn't clear this guy to work as a receptionist at many government facilities," so it doesn't get said.

The result is staggering. There are now many suits filed on the citizenship issue, but the security issue remains untouched and unnoticed as far as I can tell. Unbelievable.

This, my FRiends, is what a coup d'bureaucracy looks like.

MM (in TX)

564 posted on 11/15/2008 10:00:10 AM PST by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

To: eleni121
Wasn’t this creep vetted before he ran? What the heck is the FBI/secret service/CIA/ad nauseum doing anyway?

I think we're seeing the exposure of a mammoth hole in our election system. If I understand what I've read correctly, candidates are certified as eligible at the STATE level. And when queried on vetting of presidential candidates in California, the Secretary of State said that candidates are vetted by the PARTY. So we depend on the Democrats' honesty and diligence?

It should absolutely not be possible to become a presidential candidate without first proving eligibility, yet I believe that has clearly happened here. I believe this man is definitely not a natural-born citizen and quite possibly not a U.S. citizen AT ALL.

It should also not be possible to become a presidential candidate when you can't pass even a low-level security clearance background check, yet there is NO doubt that this has happened here. If you don't believe that, let you or I apply for a government job that requires a security clearance, and let the background check reveal that we have spent time in the company of domestic terrorists, and see if you or I get that job. My wife worked years ago for a U.S. Attorney, and the FBI was all in a dither during her background check because she once visited a man in the hospital who had ties to counterfeiting.

I'm absolutely convinced that we have the most stupendous example imaginable of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing. Or to put it more accurately, what the right hand is NOT doing. It's nobody's official job to see the proof of citizenship, so it just doesn't get seen. It's nobody's job to say, "Hey, we couldn't clear this guy to work as a receptionist at many government facilities," so it doesn't get said.

The result is staggering. There are now many suits filed on the citizenship issue, but the security issue remains untouched and unnoticed as far as I can tell. Unbelievable.

This, my FRiends, is what a coup d'bureaucracy looks like.

MM (in TX)

571 posted on 11/15/2008 10:10:19 AM PST by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson