Two things—Obama was born to an American mother so I feel he could be born on the moon (and may have been, we shall wait and see) and be a citizen.
Berg, who brought the suit, is a 9-11 truther an a Hillary supporter so he lacks credibility for me.
And third (see, a little Biden joke): I do believe what he released is sufficient, as per Hawaii law.
Hey, I know you disagree, I’m going to follow this anyway because it’s fascinating.
“... so I feel he could be born on the moon ...”
- - -
It matters not one whit how you “feel” about it.
The law is the law. And we do not know the facts.
When the law is against you, then pound the facts.
When the facts are against you, then pound the law.
When the law and the facts are against you, then pound the table.
There you go again asserting your feelings supersede law. The statute pertaining to whether he is automatically a natural born citizen, are all over this thread.
Read them maybe you can replace your feelings with knowledge
First of all, it isn’t your “feelings” that matter, it’s the Constitution that matters.
Secondly (or thirdly if you’re into Biden jokes), your opinions about “Berg” are irrelevant. This isn’t about Berg and his particular lawsuit.
Hopefully by the time you read my comment you will have done your homework, so to speak.
I don’t care for tinfoil and I do not make a habit of believing in conspiracy theories.
I learned the old-fashioned way. By that I mean that I still use commonsense. Commonsense, in this particular case, tells us that when someone is trying so hard to hide something, there must be something to hide.
It is really so simple that any debate about whether or not Obama should have to provide his birth certificate is almost comical. All Obama has to do is stand up and be honest. The fact that he hasn’t should tell you something....well, that is if you still believe in “commonsense”. :)