First of all, it isn’t your “feelings” that matter, it’s the Constitution that matters.
Secondly (or thirdly if you’re into Biden jokes), your opinions about “Berg” are irrelevant. This isn’t about Berg and his particular lawsuit.
Hopefully by the time you read my comment you will have done your homework, so to speak.
I don’t care for tinfoil and I do not make a habit of believing in conspiracy theories.
I learned the old-fashioned way. By that I mean that I still use commonsense. Commonsense, in this particular case, tells us that when someone is trying so hard to hide something, there must be something to hide.
It is really so simple that any debate about whether or not Obama should have to provide his birth certificate is almost comical. All Obama has to do is stand up and be honest. The fact that he hasn’t should tell you something....well, that is if you still believe in “commonsense”. :)
I did some research and found that the birth announcements (there are two in different Honolulu papers) were not submitted by individuals, rather they were gathered by the paper at the vital records bureau and then printed.
The reason I mentioned Berg is because he is a reason I am suspicious of this whole thing. He has analyzed the birth certificate and found it to be a forgery. He brought the law suit. He was, and I guess still is, a Hillary supporter, leading me to question whether he wanted the truth or just did all this to throw her a hail mary pass at the end of the campaign.
Your last line hits it head on. The one legitimate argument here is that O should release his long form bc. I’m still checking around so see if there is any reason why he cannot, though one would assume as president, he could. Then again, if there is some sort of Hawaiian law, I REALLY don’t want to see the precedent of the executive branch overriding a state law.