[pa mom]

I thought the scans at factcheck were pretty good. I understand some here deny that site, but I do consider what they say with some weight.

[cake_crumb]

"I thought the scans at factcheck were pretty good"

Um.

t was the scan at Fact check that proved the scan at fact check was a bad forgery.

[GCC Catholic]

I just posted this on another thread, regarding the “good” photographs of the short COLB, not the initial poor scans:

If I had access to about a dozen blank short COLB forms and a raised seal stamper, I could probably whip up just about the same things as FactCheck has photographed. Just need some photoshop and a little time; the content can be whatever random crap suits you.

At least until the original long-form copy comes out; then it’s game over, because the lie is exposed.

THAT is why it’s so important to see the real form, and why the FactCheck short COLBs are useless, even if they are legitimately from the State of Hawaii.

[Chief Engineer]

The photos at FactCheck zero in on the state seal in the purported C.O.L.B. but those photos do NOT match the true state seal for HI. The state seal of Hawaii has clearly shown detail on the figure in the middle of the seal while the photos of the seal on the C.O.L.B. which FactCheck displays are not detail! They are more like a poor imitation!

[itsahoot]

I thought the scans at factcheck were pretty good.

They are excellent, in fact all the complaints about the original, but fake that was previously posted, were corrected.