Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Running on empty, GM's fate is debated (No debate here, NO BAILOUT!)
MSNBC ^ | 11/12/2008 | Kendra Marr and Sholnn Freeman/WASHINGTON POST

Posted on 11/12/2008 5:58:26 AM PST by tobyhill

As General Motors burns through cash, edging its way toward possible financial collapse, a growing number of analysts have said bankruptcy might be inevitable. GM insists such a move is out of the question, and as the debate roils, people on both sides point to two past scenarios for lessons.

One is a story of success. Several major U.S. airlines have operated under Chapter 11 bankruptcy provisions. United Airlines has been through it. US Airways and Continental Airlines filed twice. Both Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines, which are in the process of combining operations, emerged from bankruptcy court protection last year. Labor contracts were renegotiated, and everyone, from baggage handlers to pilots, took pay cuts. Yet through it all, travelers continued to book tickets to fly.

But another was a disaster. Daewoo Motor -- South Korea's equivalent of Chrysler -- could not stay afloat during the Asian financial crisis. In 2000, burdened by $16 billion in debt, it filed for bankruptcy. About 7,000 workers lost their jobs, and many suppliers buckled. Daewoo was sold off in pieces to other automakers, including GM. Because GM's purchase did not include Daewoo's U.S. distribution network, many dealers lost their franchises. Its global brand all but disappeared.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: tobyhill
I think that GM is holding on to January, 2009 when Baraq will save them (and Ford, too) in order to save the UAW members' ridiculous benefits. In essence, all the taxpayers will be penalized for the stupidity of the management of GM and Ford.

I think that in the Obamanation of the next four years, it will be very hard for the non-union auto manufacturers to remain so.

61 posted on 11/12/2008 7:14:58 AM PST by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

Write your senators and congressman.Make phone calls no more bailouts. Tell your friends to do the same!!!!


62 posted on 11/12/2008 7:18:08 AM PST by prayerfullywaiting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: prayerfullywaiting

Include my link for the jobs bank story. That ought to infuriate anyone who reads it.


63 posted on 11/12/2008 7:20:06 AM PST by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

If GM fails, won’t the price of imports go up?


64 posted on 11/12/2008 7:21:37 AM PST by montag813 (www.FreepShop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Local talk show guy was talking this morning. He quoted from a 2006 article from the Wall Street Journal. Said that Ford had a team, called the Blue Team, in middle 2000's too look into building small, gas saving cars. They disbanded the team after they discovered that LABOR costs would PROHIBIT them making a DIME on these cars. That every one of those cars would be built AT A LOSS before it left the factory. To high light that, he said in 2006, THE LABOR COST FOR EACH auto worker, salary, SS taxes, insurance, pension, bla, bla, bla, ON AVERAGE cost $81.18 per hour in 2006. I has to be much higher today. So, EVERY auto worker is worth $81.18 PER HOUR in costs, so that was the reason they could not make cheep cars and make any profit on them.
65 posted on 11/12/2008 7:26:12 AM PST by RetiredArmy (America is entering four very long and cold years. First victim: liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

“The union’s chickensssssss, are coming home,..... to rooooooosssssssst.”

In part but the designers deserve a ton of blame. Decades of poorly engineered products in mainstream segments drove people to the Japanese. Those people are now happy and are reluctant to return to the American fold. And can you blame them? GMs are solid enough now but in most passenger segments they don’t make a compelling case to switch back. To win people back the cars have to be clearly better than Honda and Toyota. Just as good won’t win satisfied customers of Japanese companies back.


66 posted on 11/12/2008 7:41:21 AM PST by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: prayerfullywaiting

Atlas Shrugged?


67 posted on 11/12/2008 7:43:07 AM PST by Pest (Attorneys are the larval form of politicians!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Pest
Atlas Shrugged because he knew they could be profitable despite all the other problems if they just put out quality, which they know how to but won't.

My family history is research and design, they have so much on back shelves that could impress the heck out of moneyless customers, but they think falling apart almost free to produce crap is the way to go.

Just a for instance, on a dirt floor factory in frogland 1955, Citroen Id 19 = front wheel drive with center pivot hydraulic steering, giant inboard disc brakes with auto-hydraulic anti-lock (also easy to change pads you could replace yourself in 5 minutes), hydroneumatic suspension that used the rear pressure to assist braking (instead of being thrown forward in a stop the rear lowered like in a speed boat when you close the throttle), crumple zones, protected gas tank, etc. & etc. and on and on.

I don't mean to bore anyone, I just wanted to point out how far out of line production development has been for over half a century.

68 posted on 11/12/2008 7:59:27 AM PST by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

What would happen if GM were to cancel all union contracts effective close of business today. All employees would be eligible for rehire at substantially the same wages provided they were non-union.

I would predict that mass chaos would occur for a few days then the employees would trickle back in and eventually GM would thrive.

Thoughts?


69 posted on 11/12/2008 8:16:29 AM PST by cyclotic (Is Michelle Obama really Rita X?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norraad

That doesn’t surprise me. I remember hearing rumors of exremely gas efficient cars. That doesn’t bore me. It would be great if companies could be built by a group of people who put these ideas to work and then you have people who invest in these companies to develop these products. I by no means have the money to do so but I would invest in these companies instead of the stocks. Everything is controlled by government, lobbyists and these large companies. There has to be some creative way to build other companies. I believe the heart of the American people is hardworking and good. We just depend on goverment way too much. I don’t have a degree in business but isn’t most of it just common sense.
I don’t believe in these bail outs. Why give them money when obviously they are not doing their jobs?


70 posted on 11/12/2008 8:22:49 AM PST by prayerfullywaiting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: prayerfullywaiting
Thank you , I couldn't agree more.

Being inside these giants, I always cringed when I was given that lame a$$ "please the stockholders" excuse, sadly and with great effect, it really was used to shut down people with good ideas.

"what's a matter with you, we can't build a good car that will last forever, blah, blah blah, ....the stockholders".

Along with the good research, what began to take priority, was finding out how to precisely manufacture annoying features like doorhandles that become sloppy at the same time other annoying things would happen to make the new cars more attractive.

That's just wrong, no matter the blah, blah, blahing stockholders.

71 posted on 11/12/2008 8:39:35 AM PST by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

We have unsuccessful Soviet style manufacturing of Automobiles in Michigan


72 posted on 11/12/2008 9:12:46 AM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

what do you mean by that?


73 posted on 11/12/2008 9:29:28 AM PST by prayerfullywaiting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: prayerfullywaiting
It means a form of elitist control over production design & quality whose desire is counterproductive to the needs and greater good of us all.

That's as simple as I can make it.

74 posted on 11/12/2008 9:49:44 AM PST by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Yours is another angle of the same object - Communism. Sort of like the four blind men describing a elephant.

However, I am agreement with you. A part of that is the rescue of UAW, a staunch Socialism ally, and as is true with Communism in general, they and their government allies caused the problem that now needs a cash infusion.

As you know, they engineering of the Freedie Mac/Fannie Mae debacle , was to crash the economy, which the had described as awful even while it flourished, to ensure election and to also gain ownership in the banks and other financial institution who accepted their money. They also expect to own the houses and real estate they “rescued.”


75 posted on 11/12/2008 11:08:27 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot

Cloward-Piven


76 posted on 11/12/2008 11:22:44 AM PST by Pan_Yan (America has proved it's not racist. Now it needs to prove it's not suicidal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
Cloward-Piven

Largely, but with a liberal sprinkling of Saul Alinsky and George Soros thrown in.

Also flying under the radar has been a concerted drive to sign up young minority groups to SS disability benefits. I have seen it in two Texas cities, one large (Dallas) and the other small (Georgetown). Overflowing waiting rooms and long lines outside for days and days. Each minority applicant was accompanied by an adult minority "counselor" with briefcases and folders in hand.

77 posted on 11/12/2008 12:24:38 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson