[IMissPresidentReagan]

Have any “votes” for N. Coleman been “found” or discovered, or “previously uncounted”????

Just wondering, because I find it difficult to believe that every vote that was uncounted or whatever excuse is for one candidate exclusively.

[Pusterfuss]

Have any “votes” for N. Coleman been “found” or discovered, or “previously uncounted”????

Get real. This is Minnesota. They will just keep "finding" AF votes until they have enough, then they'll certify the election.

[Obadiah]

Yeah, every article I have seen since the election ALWAYS finds votes for Stuart Smalley. Have they found even ONE more vote for Coleman? What’s up with that!

[chimera]

You've noticed that "mysterious" phenomenon of how only 'Rats seem to gain "votes" in these kinds of things. You watch, they'll keep "finding" so-called "lost" batches of ballots (usually in heavily 'Rat precincts), and when Frankenputz is ahead by a couple of hundred votes, well, then, shazamm, it's such a miracle, there are no more votes to count. Isn't that amazing?! Then they all will call for "unity" and "accepting the 'will of the majority'", and expect the 'Pubs to slink off to the sidelines with their heads down and tails between their legs.

I saw, f-that. If Frankenputz steals this, throw everything including the kitchen sink at them. The 'rats know if they steal this one and the one in AK and beat Chambliss in the GA runoff, they'll have 60 Senate seats and control cloture. They may have it anyway with Specter and McCain and Snowe and Collins in there, but if they have 60 outright they can really say like Rahm Emanuel, the 'Pubs can f-themselves.