This thread is really hard to read. I expect things will change, but with the attitude people have here and now, we are doomed. Here in Alaska, the headlines are wondering how Sarah will fare with her old allies who were mostly Dems. My ultra-liberal Dem state house member is quoted in today’s paper as saying she will never trust Sarah again. She used to be a big supporter. All this makes me think about on the morons here on Free Republic. They never looked at Sarah’s record here. They just bought the line fed by the McCain campaign. Trouble is that while most Americans aren’t that smart, they are smarter than the average Freeper. For them, Sarah is a national joke . . . and will be in 2012 too. So I guess if you’re stupid, you want a stupid candidate. Sarah’s your girl. After all, Bush was plenty smart enough and did a great job for us—uh-huh. And if you’re stupid best to beat up on the smart one—that’d be Romney.
Okay, you’re from Alaska. Please enlighten us. Specifically, what has Sarah done in Alaska that is “stupid’, as you put it?
I suspect that you’re a Romney supporter who’s tired of the guy you support being beat up here by some of Palin’s supporters and am venting. I wish that everyone could, as they say in the movie Demolition Man, dump some hormones.
“My ultra-liberal Dem state house member is quoted in today’s paper as saying she will never trust Sarah again. She used to be a big supporter.”
Why won’t she “trust Sarah again”? Probably because Sarah accepted McCain’s nomination for VP. Or maybe she found out that Sarah is really conservative after all.
“They just bought the line fed by the McCain campaign.”
Again, it can be said that the McCain campaign may have really not used Sarah all that wisely.
I am stunned to. Most Freepers had looked at Sarah’s record before she was ever nominated. So what did McCain say that was wrong? Really would like to know.