“Well, if we can’t stop Amnesty, conservatives, Republicans, and other non-Party elements have no future in this country at all.A rapid amnesty of all the illegals already in the country will bring a substantial portion of Central America and Mexico across the Rio Grande and they will have to be amnestied, too. The logical extension of Amnesty will be the granting of citizenship and the Franchise to anyone born north of the Panama Canal.”
If what you say is to be taken as a reasonable and logical prediction of what’s to come (and I believe it is), then I would like to predict that the often-derided concept of “Atzlan” will eventually become reality, too.
I would call what’s happening _right now_ the phenomenon of “emerging Atzlan”. I remember seeing a graphic presentation of Hispanics in America posted right here on FR. On that map, the greatest concentration was from California (of course) across the southwest into Texas.
Having said that, perhaps the best way to re-define _where_ anyone born “north of the Panama Canal” has “citizenship” might be to redefine America’s southern boundary to “north of Atzlan” - that is, to cut the “Atzlan states” off from America, and let them exist either as their own nation or give them [back] to Mexico. Thus, by amputating a gangrenous appendage, the rest of the body of the United States might have a chance at surviving a while longer.
Stop laughing, and consider for a moment:
- Would an America without Atzlan (all “blue” and leftist) be less, or more conservative?
- Would an America without Atzlan elect a Congress composed with less or more conservatives?
- Would an America without Atzlan be less or more predisposed to elect conservative-leaning presidents?
Just sayin’,
- John
Even excising Aztlan will not change the electoral makeup of the citizenry of the remaining USA. The border with Aztlan would just be the border which they have to cross to reach Los Estados Unidos del Norte. The will wet thier backs on the Sabine River or the Platte or maybe the Mississippi.