[TheCipher]

Yes , but they are stating that the digital copy is not a fake by saying the one they examined is "real". The only way they can make that claim is if the digital copy and the one they "examined" are one and the same. It just show how disingenuous they are. Another example is where they claim it is a birth certificate, which it isn't. It is a certification, which are two completely different things.

[palmer]

I agree. The most innocent explanation is that they looked at the paper, touched it, photographed it, and said (to themselves and on the website), it exists and looks real. More likely though is that their language is meant to convey a sense that it the certificate is really obvious and the issue is trivial. That could be a facade in front of an ugly truth or it might not be. I agree they also obfuscate the BC and COLB issue.

So far from what I can see, I have to agree on the surface the issue is trivial and obvious. There are eyewitnesses for the original BC in storage. There is sufficient photographic evidence of an official COLB which would require certain tools to forge. Regardless of the junk on Kos and smears, the Factcheck COLB appears to be Hawaiian in origin.

There are only two possibilities considering their presentation, one that they are complicit or at least knowledgeable about an Obama camp forgery and are putting on a show. Or two, they are trying to distract, divide and marginalize the opposition. If the latter, I believe they have succeeded starting with a 6000 post thread here in July.