To: Demosthenes
If its true, then the Democrats would just move to change the Constitutional requirement and everyone would go for it because it’s Obama.
8 posted on
11/06/2008 1:40:33 PM PST by
rjp2005
(Lord have mercy on us)
To: rjp2005
hahaha, aint that the truth.
11 posted on
11/06/2008 1:41:37 PM PST by
Reagan79
(Ralph Stanley & The Clinch Mountain Boys)
To: rjp2005
Just have a court/judge “interpret” that out of the Constitution.
They would just have to weigh their desired outcome - that Buttock 0bama be qualified as president - and then find justification by twisting the words of the Constitution or looking at foreign law.
27 posted on
11/06/2008 1:48:09 PM PST by
MrB
(The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, and Thuggery)
To: rjp2005
Not so easy - it would require a Constitutional Amendment ratified by 3/4 of the State Legislatures. It takes years. The 27th Amendment was actually proposed along with the BIll of Rights and took over 200 years. Most modern proposals have had time limits - i.e. The ERA amendment that was never ratified.
With that said, who says the dims and 0bama intend to abide by The Constitution anyway?
87 posted on
11/06/2008 2:25:38 PM PST by
The Sons of Liberty
(In Memory of Liberty and Freedom - July 4, 1776 - November 4, 2008)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson