Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rendell, Specter say Palin hurt McCain's chances
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^ | 11/6/2008 | The Associated Press

Posted on 11/06/2008 8:27:09 AM PST by mak5

GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin took some heat Wednesday from two of Pennsylvania's top political leaders.

Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell told business leaders at a postelection breakfast that John McCain would have had a better chance of winning Pennsylvania with a different running mate, and U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, a GOP moderate, rejected the idea that the Republican party might belong to Palin.

(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: mccain; pa2008; palin; pennsylvania; specter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 next last
To: mak5
What a bunch of girlymen

Blame it on a girl, when it is the GOP and McCain (with the help of the MSN) and voter fraud and illegal campaign contributions that caused Obama to win.

141 posted on 11/06/2008 9:40:51 AM PST by Syncro (Tagline: optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mak5
The Republican party doesn't belong to Palin, but it doesn't belong to Specter either. It belongs to republican voters.

I'm keeping a long tab on assholes who are going to pen this on Palin, and if any of them are the nominee for any office I run for, I'm skipping that race or running against them as an independent.

142 posted on 11/06/2008 9:40:57 AM PST by Darren McCarty (Don't blame me. I voted for McCain/Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mak5

Specturd ? I thought he was dead. At least he played dead when Mccain needed help in Pa.


143 posted on 11/06/2008 9:42:20 AM PST by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajay_kumar

What hurt Palin more than that was running with RINO McCain. If the nominee had been someone even slightly more conservative they could have won. McCain is a symbol of what is wrong with the Republican party- he is not conservative. He had to hedge and even change his positions taken as a Senator to even try to get elected. When he threatened to leave the party a while back, he should have done it. The good old boys at the top of the GOP seem to think we needed him, but they don’t get it and they need to go.

Palin was put in a position of not being able to promote her conservative views because it would not have helped McCain in the campaign he chose to run. She had to be cautious of how what she said reflected on McCain much more so than she would have if she had been the running mate of a conservative.


144 posted on 11/06/2008 9:43:58 AM PST by Tammy8 (Please Support and pray for our Troops, as they serve us every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
I felt much the same way. Extremely disappointed that an empty-suit Marxist could actually win the Presidency. Stunned even. But not all that angry. This is America. Sometimes we elect trash, it happens, and the mess gets cleaned up.

But this attack from within the GOP on Palin is really making me mad. I'm done with the Republican Party. F all these socialist-lite RINOs.

145 posted on 11/06/2008 9:47:08 AM PST by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: mak5

I smell fear and it is coming from the RINOs. They know they had their chance to prove that moderation is the key to winning and that they lost.


146 posted on 11/06/2008 9:48:29 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint

Maybe. It’s just a thought. It’s not really making a third party in that sense. It’s more of a splitting of the old into two, except taking the majority with us. Makes starving out the rinos a lot quicker.


147 posted on 11/06/2008 9:53:50 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

You are absolutely correct. We here in SW Pennsylvania were surprised that the vote gap was that wide for Obama. We expected McCain to carry. It was the Philly vote!!! and yes, Fraud!!!!


148 posted on 11/06/2008 9:55:07 AM PST by SkyHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Russ

I’ve held my nose and voted for Specter too many times. Never again.


149 posted on 11/06/2008 9:55:29 AM PST by randita (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mak5; MrsLilac
"Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell told business leaders at a postelection breakfast that John McCain would have had a better chance of winning Pennsylvania with a different running mate, and U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, a GOP moderate, rejected the idea that the Republican party might belong to Palin."

That's ridiculous. The only reason I could vote without holding my nose was Sarah Palin. I hope she's back in some capacity in 2010 and as a candidate in 2012.

150 posted on 11/06/2008 9:56:30 AM PST by AZ .44 MAG (Am I foolish to explain things? He had such trouble with my name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

What you write is very true, but he is still a dork and a RINO. I do not trust him at all.


151 posted on 11/06/2008 9:58:47 AM PST by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint

One thing is for sure. It would take a very committed leader to get through all the rough waters while doing it.

But Steven Harper did it, and he brought the conservatives back into power, from near oblivion after Mulrooney and the old party nearly lost every seat.

After 12 years of Liberal domination, He is prime minister, and leader of the New Conservative party of Canada.

I suspect it will take us at least 2 terms as well regardless of how we do it.


152 posted on 11/06/2008 9:59:29 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: MBB1984

Reagan inspired democrats with the truth of his message- he definately ran as a conservative and reached out to the conservatives. He was not ignoring the conservatives while reaching for democrats. McCain ignored conservatives, he thought they would vote for him because they would have no other choice. He may have had a clue when his campaign was lagging with no momentum and picked Sarah to reach the conservatives. That was good- but he muzzled her because he was still aiming for dims. I think he thought he could win without conservatives- that didn’t work out too well for him in the end.

We don’t need a candidate that will appeal to dims, we need a conservative candidate that can reach conservatives with a good strong message, others will be drawn to the message by communication and leadership. That person will appeal to many others because of the message so will gather independents and even some democrats. That is the Reagan method and it worked, but many don’t to this day understand how he did it.

We can’t keep running to the left to try to gather their voters while losing our own. It simply doesn’t work.


153 posted on 11/06/2008 9:59:51 AM PST by Tammy8 (Please Support and pray for our Troops, as they serve us every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone
and vote in the damn primaries

Exactly. That's where we win or lose the general election - in the primaries. That's our ONE chance to get the true conservative into any given race.

That's also why I'll vote against both Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson when their next primary election comes up. Both of them voted for the bailout, so I'm bailing out on them.

154 posted on 11/06/2008 10:00:50 AM PST by Terabitten (To all RINOs: You're expendable. Sarah isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: mak5
Snort! Guffaw! Like we're actually going to listen to the advice of a RINO and a Marxist on the subject of Sarah Palin! What a Joke!
155 posted on 11/06/2008 10:03:59 AM PST by Desron13 (If you constantly vote between the lesser of two evils then evil is your ultimate destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mak5

Palin bashing is my new litmus test for who needs to be removed from the Republican party.

Hope someone is taking names.


156 posted on 11/06/2008 10:04:40 AM PST by listenhillary (That giant sucking sound? It's only the government consuming the fruits of our labor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

So you want to purge the center-rights huh? Ok how about we purge the far right? Unless this party unifies, Obozo is good as re-elected. We’re doing our part with Blount stepping down for Cantor to try this in good faith. So do your witchhunt elsewhere.


157 posted on 11/06/2008 10:06:52 AM PST by GerardKempf (Let's Get Over This)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: mak5

Purge the party of non-conservatives. Conservatives should fight, lobby and do whatever it takes to be in power. They then should systematically and consistently apply a conservative litmus test on every elected member of the party. If they don’t pass the test, then don’t fund them for re-election. Don’t give them any committee seats if they’re in office. Let it be known they’re tossing them out. Have press conferences and tell them who they’re actively working to throw out of the party.


158 posted on 11/06/2008 10:08:58 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GerardKempf

Go join the communist party, that’s where you belong!


159 posted on 11/06/2008 10:09:08 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

One thing is for sure, I’ll never, ever force myself to hold my nose and vote for anyone who does not represent what the party is supposed to stand for again.

How McCain even got in as the Republican candidate in the first place still bothers me, and it means there is a lot to clean up with the party admin itself. No way should a rino ever have been voted in.


160 posted on 11/06/2008 10:09:20 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson