Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voters approve Proposition 8 banning same-sex marriages
The Los Angeles Times ^ | November 5, 2008 | Jessica Garrison, Cara Mia DiMassa and Richard C. Paddock

Posted on 11/05/2008 8:51:42 AM PST by Smogger

UPDATE: Voters approve Proposition 8 banning same-sex marriages. With more than 95% of the vote counted, the measure leads 52.1% to 47.9%.

A measure to once again ban gay marriage in California led Tuesday, throwing into doubt the unions of an estimated 18,000 same-sex couples who wed during the last 4 1/2 months.

As the measure, the most divisive and emotionally fraught on the state ballot this year, took a lead in early returns, supporters gathered at a hotel ballroom in Sacramento and cheered.

"We caused Californians to rethink this issue," Proposition 8 strategist Jeff Flint said.

Early in the campaign, he noted, polls showed the measure trailing by 17 points.

"I think the voters were thinking, well, if it makes them happy, why shouldn't we let gay couples get married. And I think we made them realize that there are broader implications to society and particularly the children when you make that fundamental change that's at the core of how society is organized, which is marriage," he said.

But in San Francisco at the packed headquarters of the No on 8 campaign party in the Westin St. Francis Hotel, supporters of same-sex marriage refused to despair, saying that they were holding out hope for victory.

"You decided to live your life out loud. You fell in love and you said 'I do.' Tonight, we await a verdict," San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom said, speaking to a roaring crowd. "I'm crossing my fingers."

Elsewhere in the country, two other gay marriage bans, in Florida and Arizona, were well ahead. In both states, laws already defined marriage as a heterosexual institution. But backers pushed to amend the state constitutions, saying that doing so would protect the institution from legal challenges.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Smogger

They will over reach. Then, being a majority party, each member they will start looking out for their OWN political interests. Like my tagline says.


21 posted on 11/05/2008 9:07:33 AM PST by Paradox (When the left have no one to villainize, they'll turn on each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

They did the same thing here in Florida with the Gay marriage amendment last night. Even with 99.4% in and the measure at 62% support (requires 60% in Fla) they did not finally bow to reality until 4:00 AM or so.


22 posted on 11/05/2008 9:08:10 AM PST by Timedrifter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

I guess Ellen is no longer a groom.


23 posted on 11/05/2008 9:08:17 AM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
Marriage is a state court issue. There is no federal right to get married. And then there's DOMA. I expect the opponents to go back to state court to try to get the ban overturned but since its a constitutional amendment, its a long shot. The Left in this country says it respects the will of the people but only when the people vote for something they of which they approve.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

24 posted on 11/05/2008 9:10:00 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bella1

God has been calling all along. The people have stopped listening and have become so self centered that he allowed Obama to become president.


25 posted on 11/05/2008 9:10:09 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat. And Obama is the Antichrist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Smogger; P-Marlowe; BibChr

Just heard on Fox that some CA group is going to challenge this via the US Constitution using lawyer Gloria Alred.

I’m guessing it will focus somehow on Scotus’ right to privacy for homosexuals. What do you all think?


26 posted on 11/05/2008 9:11:01 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

First of all the first proposition was overturned by the California Supreme Court. Secondly, this is a Constititional amendment.


27 posted on 11/05/2008 9:11:26 AM PST by Smogger (It's the WOT Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

Now the law suits start. I agree with you about this being more important than the Presidential election. While I strongly opposed Obama, I was concerned as to how the real conservatives could begin to retake the Republican party with Mc Cain at the helm. I would like to see Newt take over as Chairman of the RNC and get this thing going.


28 posted on 11/05/2008 9:12:18 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timedrifter
I think Algore opened a door that destroyed civility in our country. The Left learned it could undermine a popular majority whenever that served its end. As it stands, the precedent is going to come back to haunt them. What comes around, goes around.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

29 posted on 11/05/2008 9:12:24 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

They voted to ban gay marriage constitutionally yet California voted OVERWHELMINGLY to put in a president who WILL appoint federal judges who will overturn it. You would think that Californians have had their fill of judges overturning their ballot initiatives.

Stupidity is rampant in California.


30 posted on 11/05/2008 9:13:13 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat. And Obama is the Antichrist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
the Left, sore losers, will go to court to try to get it nullified

The CA Supremes can't overturn this one base don California law; they can only say it's a violation of federal law, which would send this to the USSC. Do you really think the USSC would make gay marriage legal in the entire USA?

31 posted on 11/05/2008 9:13:32 AM PST by rivercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

(yawn)

The scumbag Democrats will challenge this prop in court and get a permanent “stay”.

In other words, “Prop 8” will meet the same fate as every other proposition passed by California voters. And the people will simply bend over, grab their ankles, say “thank you”, and then go back to sleep....

Big deal.


32 posted on 11/05/2008 9:14:03 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

You think?


33 posted on 11/05/2008 9:14:36 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: xzins
If they do that in federal court, there is no right to get married. The federal government does not legislate on state issues. But if the Left wants to continue the Culture Wars in this country, it will never end because we will always fight them and never give them peace.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

34 posted on 11/05/2008 9:14:43 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

agree


35 posted on 11/05/2008 9:15:05 AM PST by bella1 (Remember; it took four years of Carter to give us eight years of Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
4 percentage points difference means it’s only a matter of time.

You're right, even if the California courts do not overturn the ban. Had this measure been on the ballot eight years ago, it would have won by a 60:40 margin; if 20 years ago, a 75:25 margin. Forty years ago, it would have been regarded as a fringe position even in San Francisco. Sixty years ago, anyone who petitioned for legalized homosexual marriage would likely have been arrested for aiding and abetting sodomy.

36 posted on 11/05/2008 9:15:23 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
I would like to see Newt take over as Chairman of the RNC and get this thing going.

Hear! Hear!

37 posted on 11/05/2008 9:15:49 AM PST by rivercat (Draft Newt for RNC Chairman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bella1

The president has exactly zero authority over the content of the several States’ constitutions.


38 posted on 11/05/2008 9:16:24 AM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rivercat
With liberal activist judges, yes it would. I can't see the present court take it up, but if Barack Obama has it his way, that act of judicial activism is going to happen one day. Count on it.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

39 posted on 11/05/2008 9:16:53 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; P-Marlowe

I’m no lawyer, so I can’t say what it is they’re trying to accomplish. I assume they mean they’re going to try to get the new amendment declared unconstitutional.

It will not end in this epoch, so keep on fighting. It’s the right thing to do.


40 posted on 11/05/2008 9:18:33 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson