Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DeMint rips spending; Senator says bailout could haunt McCain
The Post and Courier, Charleston, SC ^ | 2008-11-01 | Robert Behre

Posted on 11/02/2008 8:41:58 PM PST by rabscuttle385

U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint said he expects American voters will give the Republican Party "an intervention" Tuesday, but he has high hopes that the party will go into rehab to rediscover its conservative values.

DeMint, R-S.C., spoke to about 40 Republican supporters during a luncheon meeting in North Charleston on Friday, and he seemed at one point to write off the chances of Republican presidential candidate John McCain.

The only South Carolina member of Congress to oppose the recent federal bailout package, DeMint said McCain was "kumbaya-ing" with President Bush, adding, "I think he lost the election in how he dealt with that."

DeMint later clarified his comments, saying that he thinks McCain still has a shot at winning, adding, "If McCain loses the election, he will have lost it because of the bailout."

His overall message was that the Washington leadership, Democratic and Republican, has failed because of excessive spending, earmarking and expanding federal control over health care and schools.

"Frankly, since Ronald Reagan we have not had a national spokesperson that can lay it all out for the American people," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at charleston.net ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: 2008; bailout; demint; economy; election; electionpresident; elections; financialcrisis; gop; mccain; mccaintruthfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 11/02/2008 8:41:58 PM PST by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: upchuck; SC Swamp Fox; Abbeville Conservative

.


2 posted on 11/02/2008 8:43:06 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" --Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

DeMint has a point. One wonders where the race would be right now if McCain opposed the bailout.


3 posted on 11/02/2008 8:44:03 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I think DeMint is about as good as Sanford.


4 posted on 11/02/2008 8:44:31 PM PST by villagerjoel ("Tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive." CS Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I certainly hope you have mailed in your absentee by now.


5 posted on 11/02/2008 8:44:38 PM PST by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“Frankly, since Ronald Reagan we have not had a national spokesperson that can lay it all out for the American people,” he said.

Yeah, Demintster, and apparently you’re not Reagan either. Keep your doom and gloom to yourself until after the election. Moron!


6 posted on 11/02/2008 8:45:13 PM PST by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
I certainly hope you have mailed in your absentee by now.

Actually, I drove home yesterday morning, had the ballot spoiled, and voted on a fresh ballot for "none of the above," thanks to you-know-who's vote on said bailout.

7 posted on 11/02/2008 8:53:39 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" --Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

You’re a nincompoop. But then you knew that. Barack Obama will splurge on the bailout much worse than McCain.


8 posted on 11/02/2008 9:03:53 PM PST by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
You’re a nincompoop. But then you knew that.

Name calling...how juvenile.

Barack Obama will splurge on the bailout much worse than McCain.

What's your point...that McCain is less Socialist than Obama? [If so, such an assertion doesn't really say much about McCain, since it's not really that hard to be less Socialist than a flat-out Marxist.]

9 posted on 11/02/2008 9:09:09 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" --Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I guess you didn’t vote for Bush then.


10 posted on 11/02/2008 9:11:20 PM PST by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, were great Americans who agreed that the federal government would assume $25 million in state Revolutionary War debt incurred and the nation’s capital would be moved to the District of Columbia to placate the southern states that had already levied high taxes to pay off their debts.

The US has waged a long and successful war in Iraq, so the bailout, therfore it has to effect the US economy and although difficult to swallow this not new to this country.

I am hearing a lot of mocking the Republicans for being hypocritical, comparing obamas spreading the wealth to be no differnt, however there is a big difference, the bail out is only a one time payment, while Obamas plan for his friends and those he labels as poor will be reoccurring and taking money from those who rightfully earned it. If I understand correctly the bailout McCain supported was to purchase sub prime loans, so in effect its not a handout but a purchase of debt.

The only thing that effects McCain then is the public lack of knowledge of American history, its lack of knowledge to tell the difference between a bailout purchase, and Marxist handouts, transfer of wealth, and its continued ascertain that McCain acted erratically which was untrue, he tried to intervene in the talks while Obama just stuck his head in the sand.

11 posted on 11/02/2008 9:12:48 PM PST by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
I guess you didn’t vote for Bush then.

In 2004, I did, but I attribute such a vote to the fact that back then, I didn't know the difference between a Socialist and a conservative.

12 posted on 11/02/2008 9:15:15 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" --Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: seastay; rabscuttle385
Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton

How dare you name call! /sarc
13 posted on 11/02/2008 9:16:27 PM PST by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

hindsight is always 20/20, if he had voted against it and the market continued to tank everyone would have pointed at him and said ah-ha, mean ole Republican doesn’t care about us... he was in a lose-lose position and I firmly believe this was the OCtober surprise, especially since Goldman Sacs keeps getting all the perks of the bailout and they gave almost $900K to Obama.


14 posted on 11/02/2008 9:17:29 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; ...
Senator DeMint - saying what needs to be said!

IF McCain wins, hopefully he'll bury Grahamnesty somewhere in the executive branch and Gov. Sanford will select another no-nonsense conservative in the mold of DeMint.

South Carolina Ping

Add me to the list. / Remove me from the list.

15 posted on 11/02/2008 9:19:43 PM PST by upchuck (Law of Logical Argument: Anything's possible if you don't know what you're talking about. => nObama))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seastay
Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, were great Americans...

Hamilton was a lover of of strong central government and the British monarchy, while Jefferson favored small, limited government.

If I understand correctly the bailout McCain supported was to purchase sub prime loans, so in effect its not a handout but a purchase of debt.

Just because a welfare payment is one-time doesn't mean that it's not a welfare payment.

The "bailout" set up a terrible precedent, and the question of where the line ought to be drawn has been raised. Will the Government buy student loans next? Auto loans? Personal loans? Credit card receivables?

The persistent manipulation of the financial markets by the do-gooders and nanny staters in our Government is what distorts the business cycle by interfering in the choices of individuals and other entities in the marketplace (through the introduction of new risks and uncertainties). The end result is the amplification (or reduction) and the prolonging (or shortening) of various financial events.

16 posted on 11/02/2008 9:23:33 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" --Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
was the bailout a payment our a purchase?

a one time bailout using tax money to make a purchase is much different than reoccurring taking taxes from just a few hand handing the money over to others, Obama just wants to hand out money, whereas the bailout was a purchase. yes??

We used to get raises at work once a year, then somebody had a bright idea to lower our raises, and give us bonus profit sharing instead making it sound as if it were better, I would have preferred just getting raise, because that is reoccurring whereas a bonus is just a one time payment Obamas plans to spread the wealth around will be reoccurring, and it will not be a government purchase, say as like a loan the bailout has done but it will be a handout, and it will be a precedent that will be hard to roll back, taxes never go down...

17 posted on 11/02/2008 9:41:40 PM PST by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
With "friends" like Dimwit, who needs enemies.

The only thing he is right about is that there will be some big changes coming after McCain wins. Dimwit and all his ilk will go the way of Ron Paul: obscurity. No more WINOs.
18 posted on 11/03/2008 12:18:19 AM PST by robert david (Any criticism of John McCain is tacit support for Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

So have you already voted for your David Duke-endorsed candidate Baldwin or are you waiting til Tuesday?


19 posted on 11/03/2008 12:21:09 AM PST by robert david (Any criticism of John McCain is tacit support for Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: robert david; upchuck
With "friends" like Dimwit, who needs enemies.

Are you referring to me or to Sen. DeMint? Cause, if the later, you need to check your meds: DeMint is an actual, proven conservative.

20 posted on 11/03/2008 5:44:24 AM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" --Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson