Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Philip Berg, Fox News, API, Standing, and the United States Supreme Court
www.americasright.com ^ | October 28, 2008 | Jeff Schreiber

Posted on 10/28/2008 2:30:15 PM PDT by jzlouis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Congressman Billybob

I find your post encouraging and I will be ready to contribute some of my meager funds to the effort to save our Country.


21 posted on 10/28/2008 3:30:14 PM PDT by mcshot (Bitterly Loving God, Family, and Guns more then ever. The Constitution Dammit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

I doubt there will be enough of us left when this is over. Look what they did to a private citizen that just asked a simple question. What do you think will happen if you try to remove him once he gets his foot in the door.

The question of his birth should be required by law to be solved prior to the election. It is just bizarre that it is not.


22 posted on 10/28/2008 3:30:57 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mcshot
I'm not seeking any contributions. Either a solid client will come forward, or not. And that's that.

John / Billybob

23 posted on 10/28/2008 3:33:50 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.AmericasOwnersManual.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

ROFL


24 posted on 10/28/2008 4:36:21 PM PDT by Kackikat (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan; Congressman Billybob
Would it be fair to say that no one has standing until Obama actually “wins” the election? If so, would this be because no one has been potentially damaged until that time?

Wouldn't you think that anybody who succumbed to the appeal by Obama for cash donations is already damaged but doesn't know it yet because Obama is hiding behind procedure to avoid exposing that he's not eligible for the office?

Isn't it fraud to present yourself to someone as something that you're not in order to accept cash? Even if Obama loses, he's still defrauded his donors based on false information. He doesn't have to win in order to be compelled to prove that he's eligible for the office, if he illegally scammed people out of the donations in the first place, by running for an office that he's Constitutionally not allowed to hold.

-PJ

25 posted on 10/28/2008 4:48:44 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

I tried to find a link to “The Bloodless Revolution of 1976” but couldn’t find it. Do you have one. I’d like to read it. Would it be helpful to read the McCarthy and Anderson decision from the USSC to help understand the current situation?

How should they have raised the issue; or would you rather wait for a competent client? Do you anticipate finding one after the election?

I just re-read your brief related to the Bush 2000 election and was quite amazed by the simple brilliance of your reasoning, even after having read it several years ago.


26 posted on 10/28/2008 5:18:48 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

WIsh you had all this information.


27 posted on 10/28/2008 5:33:45 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Acorn, Africa,Alinsky, Ayers,....BroadwayBank,Bastard child,Birthcert......now to the "C"s ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
The ABA Journal is available on line. That's the title of the article I wrote at the request of the Editor. It describes the whole McCarthy litigation, and foreshadows the Anderson litigation to come in just four years.

I'm not looking for a competent client. If one finds me, so be it. That's how I came to work for John Anderson, four years after working for McCarthy.

Thanks for your comment on my Bush v. Gore brief. It is nearly impossible for me to do anything professionally in the balance of my life than what happened in that brief. Unless, of course, Obama wins the popular election but is not elected by the Electoral College because of a case brought against his Electors the way I envision it.

I hope that isn't necessary. We'll see.

John / Billybob

28 posted on 10/28/2008 9:10:21 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.AmericasOwnersManual.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

If Obama “wins” the election, I am quite confident that a competent client will find you.

If nothing else, I will start a thread suggesting FReepers find a competent client to contact you.


29 posted on 10/29/2008 4:42:49 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Obama has not given a press conference in 30 days.

Chicken.


30 posted on 10/29/2008 7:49:45 PM PDT by bitt (I AM Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

RALLY AT SUPREME COURT FOR PHIL BERG!!
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2008 AT 3:00 PM EST

If anyone resides near this area, PLEASE join us!

Grab your signs and please be at the steps of the Supreme Court at 3:00 PM this afternoon! The things to go on the signs will be listed below. We need as large a Crowd as we can get to be waiting at the steps of Supreme Court for Mr. Berg, the person meeting him at the Train Station as well as Will Bower who will be there to accompany him there. Fox News will also be at the Train Station and will follow them all the way to the Supreme Court, filming everything.

Remember to be loud, but RESPECTFUL as this is about having the Supreme Court hear us and grant us what we are asking for, proof that Obama is eligible to run for the Office of President, our Commander In Chief. Chant Speech, Speech, Speech when you see Mr. Berg. He will either speak before he goes into the Court, unless he needs to go in immediately, if so he will speak when we comes out. He will stop and acknowledge everyone that is there and thank you for your support, if he doesn’t have time for a speech right then!!

DO NOT yell anything negative about Obama. You can yell that “Obama needs to show he is eligible”, Why the Secrecy Surrounding Obama”, “Obama Release Certified Copies Of Your Records and Papers” and you can chant over and over “Uphold Our Constitution, Defend it, We The People Demand It”.

SIGNS:

1. McCain Supporters For The Constitution

2. Obama Supporters For The Constitution

3. Uphold And Defend Our Constitution

4. Americans For The Constitution


31 posted on 10/30/2008 9:03:35 AM PDT by Lon Mohr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lon Mohr

Any news?


32 posted on 10/30/2008 1:30:14 PM PDT by nikos1121 (The first black president should be another Jackie Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob; holdonnow

So- do I understand that you believe if Obama IS elected there is still hope legally to bring a case before the Electoral College meets?

There will be others interested in such a case.

As you say- let’s hope it doesn’t come to that and Obama loses on Tuesday.

Rush brought up the topic of the birth certificate again today- and said it’s too late to get anyone to pay attention before the election. He did mention the “dump” will happen after the election. What he meant by that- I’m not quite sure- whether it was that all the oppo research is being held BACK til after the election for some reason?


33 posted on 10/30/2008 1:43:32 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
Yes, that is exactly what I am talking about. A series of state court orders telling each of the Presidential Electors that they cannot vote for Obama because he is not qualified to be elected. This would be the same as the Constitution telling them that they cannot vote for someone who is younger than 35 years old.

As you say, I hope that becomes unnecessary. And keep in mind, if those Democrat Electors are freed to vote for anyone except Obama, they will likely vote for Hillary Clinton, not John McCain. It would still be nasty, just not as nasty as Obama.

John / Billybob

34 posted on 10/30/2008 1:52:38 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.AmericasOwnersManual.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

As dreadful as we know Hillary would be- if it were between she and Obama- I’d take Hillary in a heartbeat.

As a non-lawyer- I wouldn’t begin to know what the correct and most compelling case would be against Obama- but even to my untrained eye- it doesn’t seem Berg had it..


35 posted on 10/30/2008 2:03:33 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Deek

None of these people wants to get involved in a matter where the press, the Pied Piper and the institutions involved are capable of winning; altering documents and the like. What would the candidates with standing win, even if they won? Even the RNC wants the Pied Piper to fail on his own, which he will. Then they can seek a long term resurgence, rather than a Constitutional crisis, which will spare the GOP generations of reputation as the party of ethnic hatred.


36 posted on 11/05/2008 10:14:14 AM PST by jschwartz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson