Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kozman

Yep, it’s on Drudge’s website front and center and atleast 2 of the morning talk radio hosts were playing clips from Obama’s own words back in 2001...his own words will bring him down! NO SOCIALISM for USA! NOBAMA!


5 posted on 10/27/2008 9:31:54 AM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: princess leah

Its our duties to forward the video along to all of our friends, families, and acquaintances.


6 posted on 10/27/2008 9:33:22 AM PDT by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: princess leah
HUGE BLOG REACTION ROUNDUP.
7 posted on 10/27/2008 9:33:59 AM PDT by Jay777 (My personal blog: www.stoptheaclu.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: princess leah; All

Is this on National Review Online.....have you sent it to Palin/McCain etc.?

Of EVERYTHING that has come out so far, this is one of the best. Membership in the New Party etc. is big, but this is bigger because of WHAT he said and that it is his OWN words, not a membership the party itself disputes.

For some reason another Freeper points out in a post the section about his view on the Supreme Court. WHO CARES????

That is not the big deal here....

His view of redistribution of wealth IS.

Here is the actual quotes:

“But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as people tried to characterize the Warren court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn’t shifted. One of the I think tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributed change and in some ways we still suffer from that....Any three of us sitting here could come up with a rational for bringing about economic change through the courts.”

McCain campaign:

info@johnmccain.com

(703) 418-2008

Nice response from McCain camp today on this audio:

“”The American people continue to learn more about Barack Obama. Now we know that the slogans ‘change you can believe in’ and ‘change we need’ are code words for Barack Obama’s ultimate goal: ‘redistributive change.’ In a previously uncovered interview from September 6, 2001, Barack Obama expressed his regret that the Supreme Court hadn’t been more ‘radical’ and described as a ‘tragedy’ the Court’s refusal to take up ‘the issues of redistribution of wealth.’ No wonder he wants to appoint judges that legislate from the bench – as insurance in case a unified Democratic government under his control fails to meet his basic goal: taking money away from people who work for it and giving it to people who Barack Obama believes deserve it. Europeans call it socialism, Americans call it welfare, and Barack Obama calls it change,” McCain senior policy adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin said in a statement.”


45 posted on 10/27/2008 10:29:18 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson