Skip to comments.
Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court
ObamaCrimes.com Phillip Berg ^
| 10/25/2008
| Phillip j. Berg
Posted on 10/25/2008 3:52:37 PM PDT by Danae
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 481-486 next last
To: expatpat
Bill Richardson, Chris Dodd, even Joe Biden too, along with the other bunch of Democrat also-rans for their party’s nomination would have standing at this juncture and leading up to it.
McCain has more standing than anyone it would seem, especially in the event that Hussein wins the election—but he’d be the last person to throw stones.
141
posted on
10/25/2008 5:14:49 PM PDT
by
VigilantAmerican
(We will not waver, we will not tire; we will not falter, we will not fail)
To: ricki21092
In a nutshell yes.
According to the courts we the people have no right to question the Constitutional Eligiblity of a candidate for President.
That has to be changed... Only bodies that can do it are Congress OR the SCOTUS.
Its my belief that Obama is a NATURALIZED citizen which is what that attack dog McCaskhill tried to get that clause into the recent legislation that actually referred to McCain. Thankfully it didn’t work. Wonder why Obama’s favorite spin-dog wanted THAT in there...
142
posted on
10/25/2008 5:18:51 PM PDT
by
Danae
(Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
To: Danae
agreed. If it is simply a matter of colb showing something embarrassing, like a different father than obama, then he can just release it after the election and quash the issue.
If it (the Hawaiian colb) simply doesn’t exist, then we will never get a demonstrable answer from his camp, and if he wins, the issue will be totally supressed.
To: Danae
He is going to ask the SCOTUS to change the law in essence. To make it possible for the average person to question the qualifications of a candidate for President. This is either a Pandora's Box, or a chance for the average Man to have a say with just cause to do so.Once again you make no sense (which is even more amazing since you seemed to barely read the very article that you posted)
144
posted on
10/25/2008 5:19:17 PM PDT
by
torchthemummy
(Why Is The Educational Establishment Comfortable With Ayers' Unrepentent Radicalism (Terrorism)?)
To: WoofDog123
I really don't think SCOTUS is going to want to touch it once Riots start springing up either....
If they deal with it now they could avert some NASTY stuff if they wait till after the election and heaven forbid the man Obama gets elected.
In reality not taking it disenfranchises millions of Voters. They can't afford THAT either.
145
posted on
10/25/2008 5:20:57 PM PDT
by
Danae
(Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
To: Born In America; lovesdogs
My impression is that “Born In America” didn’t understand what the label “truther” denotes.
Maybe some prompting would help.
“Truthers” are those who think 9/11 was an inside job; a “neocon” conspiarcy to get us into a Middle East war for oil, whatever the windmill one wishes to tilt at may be...
If Born didn’t realize that, it would explain Born’s reaction to your post—Born perhaps thought you were being incoherent when in fact you were making perfect sense.
146
posted on
10/25/2008 5:21:22 PM PDT
by
VigilantAmerican
(We will not waver, we will not tire; we will not falter, we will not fail)
To: VigilantAmerican
He has no standing at this point. After the election, that would change but do you really think he would act?
To: RummyChick
Rodney king riots will look like a tea party compared to what we will see.I agree, but that was NOT a Constitutional problem!!!
148
posted on
10/25/2008 5:24:00 PM PDT
by
danamco
To: GoLightly
Wouldn’t a better “harm” in the case be the possible disenfranchisement of Berg’s vote? If Obama is not eligible to be POTUS and Berg is a Democrat, isn’t there a chance his vote and others would be null and void if after the election Obama is disqualified. Possible vote disefranchisement should give Berg standing before the election.Congress can make new laws later.
To: BGHater
" I've said all along, Berg needs to call one of the three guys who were caught in the State Department looking at High Profile Passports, including Obamas. "
Maybe there needs to be a full investigation of the State Department to see if there was any shenanigans going on , that ? some how ? they managed to issue Obama a passport.
To: Danae
He likely has a Senate issued Diplomatic PassportOn face value with just a few photos fooling them like he fooled the DNC not vetting him properly!!!
151
posted on
10/25/2008 5:26:35 PM PDT
by
danamco
To: torchthemummy
"Once again you make no sense (which is even more amazing since you seemed to barely read the very article that you posted)" Please back that statment up. What I said is accurate. Surrick stated that his court has no jursdiction to decide the matter, and he also based his decision on Standing. Berg is going to be appealing to the SCOTUS, and doing so he is going to have to prove he has standing to do so. That means SCOTUS will have to rule that he DOES have standing which will CHANGE Legal Precidence. It will change the law. So you want to back up your assertion?
152
posted on
10/25/2008 5:26:43 PM PDT
by
Danae
(Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
To: Klepto
This case was filed MONTHS ago.
153
posted on
10/25/2008 5:27:49 PM PDT
by
Danae
(Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
To: Danae
If the average person is a citizen of the republic, he has a right to know if the candidate is qualified. He has a right to make sure that the election is run fairly, in fact that is is DUTY. Not the duty of the government or government lawyers or crooked politicians! That's why they are supposed to have students read the Constitution in school. It is so that you know you are SOVEREIGN, and the government has power over you only if you ALLOW it. To allow a foreign national or otherwise unqualified person run for office and take money from foreign governments or foreign sources to fund it is the essence of anti-Americanism.
To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Seems so basic, doesn't it?
To: Danae
March on soldiers! If there is nothing to hide it should never have gotten this far, IMVHO. Deny, deny, deny and delay, delay, delay...;)
156
posted on
10/25/2008 5:32:15 PM PDT
by
callthemlikeyouseethem
(Biden10/19/08: "I probably shouldn't have said all this because.. the press is here")
To: Danae
Hun, I am desperately afraid you are right. It will make ALL of the race riots look like a Teletubbies birthday party. because its going to involve people outright attacking others because they have a McCain bumper sticker, or sign in their yards. This time it isn't about race, its about Ideology and Socialism has no issues at all with eliminating decent through death. Yesterday I drove around in our immidiate neighborhood. 15 nobama sign vs 1 one McCain. People are scared, I did not put up any sign for same reason living in a mixed (most black) development!!!
157
posted on
10/25/2008 5:32:17 PM PDT
by
danamco
To: Danae
I don’t disagree with you, but I believe SCOTUS is a political animal and they will tend to not want to get involved in something like this if possible.
To: Qwackertoo; Terry Mross; dware; bamahead; danamco; Brown Deer; April Lexington; StarFan; ...
Who thinks we need to organize a huge protest for the citizens right to insist that he has standing in the issue to have only qualified candidates appear on the ballots for the office of the Presidency?
terry mross;dware;bamahead;danamco;brown deer;april lexington;starfan; mnehrling; xkaydet65;danae; know et al; golightly; miss didi;FreedomCalls ; Klepto;djf;BlessedBeGod; Prophet in the wilderness; Qwackertoo; Ballybill;
Jeff Head; Retired Greyhound; Bigh4u2;TommyDale; RoseofTexas;
comps4spice;ncfool;nhwingut;comps4spice;Bigh4u2;Danae;lovesdogs;
Right Wing Assault;Chuck N;ConservativeMind;TommyDale;expatpat;
Portrait of a Lady;HEY4QDEMS;Bigh4u2;Calpernia; Kevmo; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; Polarik; PhilDragoo; LucyT; beckwith;ncfool; markl;chainsaw;eyedigress; cmj328;Texas4ever;mombi;StarFan
159
posted on
10/25/2008 5:32:43 PM PDT
by
Gemsbok
(Will the real Barry Dunham, Barry Soetoro, Barack J. Obama, Barack Husein Obama...please stand up?)
To: CitizenUSA
If he is allowed to become president with this question still open, the other requirements are now suggestions as well. A 21-year-old President? Sure, why not?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 481-486 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson