Posted on 10/25/2008 7:31:47 AM PDT by NoobRep
So, who does have standing? According to the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, that's completely up to Congress to decide.
If, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like Plaintiff. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring in the Amended Complaint.
(Excerpt) Read more at americasright.com ...
Seriously, take my screen name down and if you find you need me, Freepmail me.
So it seems there would be a two month window for him to be elected, but not in power enough to block an attempt to have his fraud brought to court?
I am declaring myself president.
You have no standing to object.
I own the congress, I own the universities, I own the media, I own the courts, I own the entertainment business.
I am Barack Obama, and I approved this pre-election coup message.
Couldn’t agree with you more, festus.
It's possible Obama does have a birth certificate, but it's a Kenyan BC. It's also possible that he does have a Hawaiian BC, but that the Hawaiian BC reveals that his father is someone other than Obama Sr. or that his father is UNKNOWN.
Berg needs to appeal.
It might also be helpful for a group of members of the U.S. military who have sworn oaths to defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic to file a parallel suit: they could argue that their oath, and the prospect of having a CIC who does not meet the Constitutional requirements to serve at POTUS gives them standing.
Actually, if the claimant to the office of POTUS were constitutionally ineligible to serve, all member of the military, who have sworn oaths to defend the Constitution of the U.S. against all enemies foreign and domestic, would have a sworn duty to remove said pretender from office.
Translated = BOUGHT OUT!!!
We are being sold out to the Muslims???
You mean like Bill Clinton's and Obama's opinion? They're Constitutional lawyers -- at least to the extent that they both are lawyers (or Clinton was, at any rate, and is now eligible to be reinstated), and both taught Constitutional law at the university level.
Does this have any meaning today:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
However, when I see you spam it here again, I can't keep giving you the benefit of doubt!!
Seems to me that the first "stamp" fits on you, regardless how long you have been here, TEACHER!!!
You're right, Yaelle. Nothing counts, that is, if it goes against the position of the government's elites. That's just the way it is in every dictatorship, and the US is fast slipping into one.
Berg may have a strange past, but in this case he’s right on.
The coverup continues.
Obama’s Hawaiian birth certificate doesn’t say that he was born in Hawaii. It cannot, because there was no doctor’s or midwife’s certificate submitted. Neither of the hospitals in Honolulu has record of his birth, nor of his mother havin been checked in for child birth.
His grandmother swears that he was born in Mombasa; why would she lie?
The doubt is gone, now that the court has closed ranks with the Democrat establishment that appointed the judge. Ruling that the voters lack standing to mount a constitutional challenge is an admission that the case has merit.
If voters lacked that standing, the thousands of environmental suits that have crippled this nation would have been thrown out of court. If voters lacked standing, who could possess it? All that hold office are placed there by the voters.
I was up nearly all night, and don't feel like posting any new articles, but now the media has attacked the Christian Right, did a search and can't see that it has been posted here.
Google results, over 11 pages of hits, "Christian Right Intensifies Attacks on Obama
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.