You know, I showed this case to my wife, who is an attorney, and her first comment was that this guy makes a lot of allegations but the fact of the matter is that he really doesn’t explain his standing to sue. He doesn’t explain how he has been actually harmed in any way by the Obamanot or any of the other respondents. She doesn’t even think that the Federal courts could have Jurisdiction over a case like this since the federal election is really 50 individual state elections. She seemed to feel that the State courts are the only place you could disqualify him from the ballot for such allegations.
Tell your wife that this old judge says she is dead on. This one will never get by the Standing issue.
How can she say this is a states' issue? The Feds have unconstitutionally usurped states' and individual rights on a lot of things, but this isn't one of them. This is clearly a U.S. Constitutional issue and should be pursued in federal/Supreme Court until the matter is settled. If Obama is found to not be a natural-born American citizen, then by Constitutional Law, he is disqualified to be President of the United States.
The matter is filed, the request for admissions were served timely and as i understand it, no motion to dismiss or for summary judgment by Defendants has been filed raising the standing issue. Therefore, discovery rules still apply and the request for admissions must be deemed admitted if not responded to within the requisite 30 days. As for the standing issue, i would think that any U.S. citizen would or could be deemed to have been harmed by the election of a fraud who would gladly throw us into a constitutional crisis not to mention the chasm of chaos.