Posted on 10/22/2008 4:20:38 PM PDT by ncfool
God knows I want to see the Great O-Bomber blowup in a great flaming fireball ....
Right. I listen to Quinn and Rose everyday. They’ve been on the BC for quite a while and has had Phillip Berg on the show at least twice.
Press: Joe’s not his real name, USA: Soetoro is Barry’s real name? Nightline shills for O
http://palin247.com ^
It would maybe go better for the Obama shills if they stay away from the issue of “people’s real name” The Press is just starting to check people’s background. Nightline Co-anchor Martin Bashir derided, “But his name’s not Joe and he’s not a registered plumber. And those are only half his problems.” Wow. How many stories did they do about Barack Hussien Obama’s real name Barry Soetoro or Barry Dunham. What is his real name. Oh he told us so we just need to take his word for it.
Lars Larson had Berg on yesterday for about 15 minutes. I think Berg just might have the goods on Obama.
You here the train a coming and its starting to speed out of control! Let’s hope the train wreck is going to be big. We need to stop the Jihad from happening in America.
I forgot....O’reilly said the birth certificate issue was a joke....said it a couple weeks ago so I guess he knows something Berg doesn’t know.....NOT
As long as Andy Martin is in the mix, no self respecting On-Air media outlet will touch this.
I haven’t heard word one on this from Hannity or Rush
No doubt the Clintons would have preferred that the VRWC be the source of this issue, maybe a reason they are all leery of being the Clintons’ tool
Not that the democrats won’t still blame the VRWC for breaking this news on poor grieving Barry
I don't think Obama is anywhere near the politician Bill Clinton is, but I think he has mastered some of the moves.
A former savage fan, because of his Coulter and Palin bashing, but you’re full of bull excretion.
I listen to Hannity, Boortz, Limbaugh, and Levin. NONE have touched it, and Boortz ripped on a guy for bringing it up.
So fess up. You damn liar.
thanks for the docket site. Reading the last one, does this mean Berg’s case will be dismissed?
Sure, just like no self respecting media would touch the John Edwards story “ almost no child left behind - oops” because it was in the National Enquirer
The press excoriated and eviscerated Joe the Plumber, a not-so-subtle hint to any peons contemplating an encore.
However that requires considerable forethought to put that trap out there. It sounds all too complicated!
I’d have no problem asking him....could care less what the press says about me. I wouldn’t parade around GMA etc doing morning news/variety shows that is for sure...I’d simply ask him why he is even “defending” himself in this case and not just release the birth certificate to the curious citizen who’s using the courts to tell us where and when he was born...you know..officially.
An “innocent” respondent would produce a document that clears them...and they’d re-issue one if there was “ANY” doubt the one floating around the country wasn’t legitimate.
A “guilty” respondent would fight the motions to produce a document that would clear them....
so it just looks...well ...like something is out there.
No I don’t think so as it was just the FEC stating that they shouldn’t be a party to the suit. Not sure how they could make that assertion but the judge might accept their motion he will not dismiss this suit with out a hearing as it to much of a hot issue at this time.
The DNC’s response is totally unacceptable as they could have produced the documents and ended this mess.
The Judge will motion up some kind of hearing fast.
Listening now and a caller on Savage stated that Barack Hussein had four different identities and the media is hiding the facts. Yes, the October surprise might be exciting.
Then I would determine whether his legal teams working beau coups billable hours have received any public or campaign funding to help him play this game of Constitutional chicken
Neal Boortz mentioned it last week, but only to call us a bunch of tin-foilers for following it.
Their prettty careful to wait and get factual information.
On one hand, Since Congress controls the rules on immigration, all they have to do is convene an emergency session and pass new immigration rules making the immigration rules passed one year after Obama was born and make them retroactive.
The only thing they couldn’t do is change him to a natural born citizen or decide if he can reclaim his natural born citizenship if he lost it when he was adopted.
I’ve often wondered when they talked about getting his father to allow him to be adopted by his grandparents, and then he was never adopted? Or were they trying to give him natural born citizenship by getting him adopted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.