Posted on 10/19/2008 1:28:10 PM PDT by ari-freedom
Buried in that 8,000 (!) word NYT magazine article about Obamas economic plan that I mentioned yesterday, is this bit flagged by Geraghty at Campaign Spot:
If you talk to Warren [Buffet], hell tell you his preference is not to meddle in the economy at all let the market work, however way its going to work, and then just tax the heck out of people at the end and just redistribute it, Obama said. That way youre not impeding efficiency, and youre achieving equity on the back end. He continued by saying that he thought there was some merit in Buffetts argument.
To which, Geraghty responds: Isnt it reassuring to have a presidential candidate saying he sees some merit in taxing the heck out of something? Indeed.
(Excerpt) Read more at audacityofhypocrisy.com ...
bttt
.
Thanks potlatch -
.
Thanks potlatch -
Thanks devolve.
I’ve been trying to keep this thread above the radar. It certainly is relevant in light of the big Drudge news of today — this thread reveals that BO hasn’t changed since then:
Drudge Headline: 2001 OBAMA: ‘TRAGEDY’ THAT ‘REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH’ NOT PURSUED
http://www.drudgereport.com [also put report in ‘view replies’]
Obama wants a lot more redistribution of wealth than he’s letting on, and his judicial appointments will be as bad as we feared.]
Also the lead story at Michelle Malkin’s website: http://michellemalkin.com/
Discussion thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2116186/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.