Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/13/2008 4:38:28 AM PDT by Kozman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kozman

Meet Obama’s next Fed Chairman

Hoo boy


2 posted on 10/13/2008 9:26:18 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman

Hey! He just happens to be a flaming socialist Obama-supporter. What are the chances!


3 posted on 10/13/2008 9:27:50 AM PDT by scottinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman

I thought they renamed the Nobel to the Koookiest Lib Alive award.


4 posted on 10/13/2008 9:30:26 AM PDT by JerseyDvl (What do Obama and Osama have in common?-They both have friends who bombed the Pentagon! - Bill Ayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman

LOL. He is weak.


5 posted on 10/13/2008 9:30:52 AM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman

AYFKM? Krugman is a hack and an A-hole.


6 posted on 10/13/2008 9:32:39 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman

Scrappleface???


7 posted on 10/13/2008 9:33:55 AM PDT by Misschuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman

Obama was robbed, but I hear he is still in the running for the prizes in Physics and Medicine.


8 posted on 10/13/2008 9:36:12 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman
'Paul Krugman Wins Nobel Prize in Economics'
Whoop-dee-doo.

Today, winning a Spongebob Squarepants doll at the local carnival has more meaning & value.

9 posted on 10/13/2008 9:39:32 AM PDT by Condor51 (The only difference between Bill Ayers and Timothy McVeigh is the body count!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman

Krugman? Of the New York Slimes? He of disrepute in print? The non-Economist of hack writers?


10 posted on 10/13/2008 9:46:23 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Bushonomics: Privatize Gains, Socialize Losses......."PAULSON'S THEFT")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman

Krugman a Nobel? For what? Mindless rhetoric?

This is right up there with Gore as evidence that the Nobel Committee has lost it’s collective marbles.


12 posted on 10/13/2008 9:53:35 AM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman

As an Economist, Krugman is highly respected. Its a shame that he is hyper-partisan, however, as it often seems to intrude even into his economic opinions.


13 posted on 10/13/2008 10:01:05 AM PDT by Paradox (Obama, the Audacity of Hype.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman

A joke. Absolutely political.

Comparable to Al Franken winning the Literature prize for “Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot.”


14 posted on 10/13/2008 10:04:30 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("[Obama acts] as if the very idea of permanent truth is passe, a form of bad taste"-Shelby Steele)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman
http://www.krugmanwatch.com/

"Never before has one economist been so wrong about so much, and gone so long without anyone pointing it out. Well, that’s all about to change."

17 posted on 10/13/2008 11:38:55 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Bushonomics: Privatize Gains, Socialize Losses......."PAULSON'S THEFT")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman
Algore and Jimmuh Cahtuh won peace prizes, so anything's possible with this bunch.
18 posted on 10/13/2008 1:13:12 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...

Columnist Paul Krugman Wins Nobel Economics Prize
Yahoo | 10/13/08 | Karl Ritter and Matt Moore
Posted on 10/13/2008 5:48:12 AM PDT by kidd
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2104368/posts

Bush critic Krugman wins Nobel Economics Prize
(Nobel committee robs Obama)
AFP via yahoo | Oct 13, 2008 | by Nina Larson
Posted on 10/13/2008 8:02:38 AM PDT by staytrue
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2104413/posts

Columnist Paul Krugman wins Nobel economics prize
(You Have To Be Kidding Me?!?)
AP | 10-13-2008 | Karl Ritter and Matt Moore
Posted on 10/13/2008 9:23:02 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2104449/posts


19 posted on 10/13/2008 2:43:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman

Ugh.


20 posted on 10/13/2008 2:48:24 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman

Hahaa... And here I thought the Nobel couldn’t possibly become any more of a laughingstock.


21 posted on 10/13/2008 2:50:02 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman
Paul Krugman is not as bad on economics as some people claim. He is in favor of sweatshops and against rent control:

http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/smokey.html

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E4DF153FF934A35755C0A9669C8B63

24 posted on 10/13/2008 3:08:19 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kozman

Here is what Donald Luskin of the Krugman Truth Squad has to say about his prize ) :

KRUGMAN WINS THE NOBEL PRIZE The Nobel Prize is never posthumous — it is only awarded to living persons. So some great minds such as John Maynard Keynes and Fischer Black never received the prize in Economics. All that has changed. With today’s award to Paul Krugman, the Nobel as gone to an economist who died a decade ago. The person alive to receive the award is merely a public intellectual, a person operating in the same domain as Oprah Winfrey. And even as a public intellectual, the prize is inappropriate, because never before has a scientist operating in the capacity of a public intellectual so abused and debased the science he purports to represent. Krugman’s New York Times column drawing on economics is the equivalent of 2006’s Nobelists in Physics, astronomers Mather and Smoot, doing a column on astrology — and then, in that column, telling lies about astronomy.

But what’s done is done. The only question now is whether Krugman will pay taxes on the prize at the low rates enabled by the Bush tax cuts he has done so much to discredit, or if he will volunteer to pay taxes at higher rates he considers more fair.


27 posted on 10/13/2008 8:42:40 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson