Posted on 10/12/2008 7:45:41 AM PDT by Kaslin
Most Americans wake every morning to news that Barack Obama will win next month’s presidential election. Strategists even say the word “landslide” aloud.
Every poll shows it, every pundit echoes it, and every analyst predicts it – therefore it must be true, right?
Let’s take this political axiom to some of those who do the predicting, to project what America will look like under an Obama administration, governing with a Democratic congressional majority led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
“First of all, let’s dismiss any talk of socialism,” says Democrat strategist Bob Beckel, who worked in Jimmy Carter’s White House with a Democrat-controlled Congress. “The idea that Barack Obama is going to bring socialism to this country is just crazy.”
Beckel says that, in government and politics, the policy pendulum always swings back and forth and, particularly in this economic crisis, “people will want – and Obama will deliver – more government involvement.”
“They feel more comfortable with that than they do with a bunch of people on Wall Street,” he says.
Beckel sees an Obama appointment of Hillary Clinton to the Supreme Court bench as soon as an opening occurs, and he dismisses the massive move towards industry regulations that some people predict.
One insider, who refuses to predict on the record, says privately that Obama will quickly announce his appointments to the cabinet positions of state, defense, treasury and attorney general. He believes Obama’s cabinet is shaping up to look like this: retiring U.S. Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., as defense secretary; Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick as attorney general; New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a political independent, at treasury; Susan Rice as national security advisor; Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., as secretary of state.
Mark Siegel, a former Democratic National Committee executive director, says Obama will want to make it immediately clear to America and to the world that “there's a new sheriff in town." He expects Obama to make that point dramatically by issuing several executive orders.
Siegel says you will see Obama immediately suspend all pending judicial nominations, close Guantanamo, then reassure the world that he will never permit torture.
Also look for a doubling of the Peace Corps, a brand-new Volunteer Youth Network, an expansion of U.S. assistance for “Teach for America," and a reduction of interest rates on student loans, Siegel predicts.
What a difference four short years makes says Brian Darling, a congressional analyst for the Heritage Foundation.
Darling predicts Obama’s tax policy will have an immediate effect on small businesses and result in many individuals seeing their marginal tax rate double. Any Supreme Court retirements would dramatically change the direction of American jurisprudence. And he warns that the push for new regulations is the wrong reaction to problems on Wall Street.
“We need more capitalism, not less. Telecommunications has thrived without regulations, and our economy should make sure that politicians in Washington do not try to regulate and tax our way out of the current economic downturn.”
University of Arkansas political scientist Bob Maranto says the Illinois senator is a pragmatist tactically: “Obama knows that if you try to impose things like racial quotas and gay marriage, that would not be a vote-winner. But if you appoint federal judges who impose those policies, you can evade responsibility.”
Maranto suspects those are the judges Obama would appoint.
He warns that Obama is no fool. “Socialism is dead, and Barack Obama knows it,” he explains. “He would, however, favor a very strong government hand in regulating the economy, both because he believes that government knows best and because that means more subsidies and jobs to hand out to supporters, and more votes and PAC contributions to get in return.”
All four men agree that if Obama becomes president with Congress sharing his beliefs, then “change” is definite – but not infinite.
The degree of success or enforcement, they say, depends on how far the press and the next mid-term election will allow the new president and Congress to go.
I was being sarcastic. To use the Reagan/Carter pre-election polls and this one as reason to be optimistic is a bit of a stretch...
Reagan knew exactly what he was doing. He was energetic..optimistic and enthusiastic. We sensed what was happening....a total revolution and we felt it.
McCain (this is NOT sarcasm now) doesn’t act like he knows what he is doing. He isn’t enthusiastic...is running as the guy Obama is agreeing with in debates...that’s hardly refreshing. We sense a new kind of revolution going on...The socialist revolution...and it’s leader is Barack Obama. The polls I am afraid are not off that much. We are witnessing the days prior to an avalanche against us. Obama is set, with the blessings of the MSM, to be the biggest winning Democrat in a long long time...on an agenda of socialism....and McCain? his strategy was to be “almost” like Obama.
I’m afraid the only thing to wake up America is an enemy attack.
Then they will track them down and send in armed teams like they do when you don't register your firearms. If you resist, you die.
If spammers can continue to send Viagra ads to all and sundry, so can political types. Do the hit-and-run!
And suppose an entire country cut loose and gave the finger to the UN? They would have to undertake the expense of invading and occupying all that just to shut down a few loudmouths? Their trying to do anything of the sort should result in a massive game of whack-a-mole. Make them work hard for it!
First, spammers can be found....when the authorities try hard enough.
Second, no country will give the UN a finger as the UN will be backed up by US troops. Don't you remember Clinton putting our troops under blue-helmet control? Obama will surely do the same.
There is precedent for all of this.
An Obomba presidency will set race relations back several decades....tension is a mild word.
Almost every truly major piece of "legislation" these past 70 years came from the Scotus. Instead of acting a check on a rapacious Congress and Executive, the courts are handmaidens to the erosion of our Constitution.
OK, so it'll be more like Marxism, or Obamism or whatever they're planning to call the new social order.
mark
Well we have 3 grandsons. Not only is the Judeo-Christian Western Worldview being negated in their schools but their families are scared to death of the economic future. Still, at least these two parents are voting Pub. I find it sad as you do that even our history, our heritage is slipping from view as the secularists, socialist pacifists think that just being ‘sweet, fair, non-judgmental’ will stop evil. BHO will rue the day he tries those ideas with Iran, China and Russia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.