Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WRONG FOR THE RIGHT (McCain Blew It for Conservatives)
NY Post ^ | October 12, 2008 | DAVID FREDDOSO

Posted on 10/12/2008 6:21:16 AM PDT by BarnacleCenturion

To the degree that they are engaged in this election, conservatives are motivated entirely by fear of Obama and what he will do as president when backed by a solidly liberal Democratic House and Senate. They are not driven by love of the Republican candidate, and it shows in the anger present at McCain campaign rallies. Most conservatives will probably vote for McCain, but they also realize they are far less likely to persuade others, and they feel a disaster coming. The enthusiasm the Right felt during the 2004 election, which had been framed as a true ideological clash between Left and Right, simply does not exist this time around.

McCain's abrupt embrace of a big-government solution to the mortgage crisis during last week's debate places an exclamation point upon his many apostasies from conservative thought. Never a believer in supply-side economics, McCain had denounced the tax cuts of 2001. His push for campaign finance reform, for carbon emission restrictions, for federal regulation of boxing, and his long-standing defense of the Death Tax prior to this election have always made his agreements with conservatives on other issues appear to be accidental overlaps rather than a sign of common philosophical belief.

What would have happened if Republicans had nominated a conservative this time around? Conservatives must consider the possibility that things would look just as bad as they do now. The Bush presidency, by its mere association with conservative ideas, has ruined many of Republicans' best issues, creating an overwhelming headwind for any Republican running this year.

But a true conservative might also have shown voters an alternative rather than someone who incites "I agree with John" in the debates; someone to put Obama's left-wing policies in stark relief.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; conservatives; conservativevote; freddoso; headinsandmccainiacs; itstheeconomystupid; mcbama; mccain; mccaintruthfile; mcqueeg; obama; obamacons; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-187 next last
To: Illinois Rep

I concur 110% with your expressed vewpoint here. It’s right on the mark.


61 posted on 10/12/2008 7:40:22 AM PDT by Ron H. (October 3, 2008 - the day we morphed into the 'United Socialist States of America')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
If this David Freddoso was a true conservative he would never have written this for publication at this time. What was his plan, to show all the world that conservatives will throw away the election just to make a point?

Nonsense. Freddoso's had his life threatened by Obama supporters because of his book, and anything I've ever read of his political opinions have been conservative.

Granted, it's not pleasant to read this, because it's true. It's not going to discourage conservatives from voting -- they know the alternative, and if you think about it, it's not going to discourage any moderate or Hillary supporter -- they're not particularly enamored of conservatives, in case you haven't noticed.

This idea of throwing away the election to make a point is further nonsense, considering who's running against him.

However, even if McCain manages to win, conservatives won't be dancing in the aisles for very long.

62 posted on 10/12/2008 7:41:54 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
Obama gets in there will NEVER be another honest election in this country --short of a military backed revolution the left will preside over our downfall

There is some wisdom in those words.

63 posted on 10/12/2008 7:42:09 AM PDT by Ron H. (October 3, 2008 - the day we morphed into the 'United Socialist States of America')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Illinois Rep

vote vote vote for McCain

and develop a personal and family strategy to cope with the coming changes in America if McCain loses

figuring out how to shelter my kids from becoming cannon fodder in a future ill-devised socialist foreign policy venture purposely or unintentionally resulting from an Obama mindset, and returning to roots of economic self sufficiency (barter and frugality instead of creating wealth to be taxed away) are part of my thinking


64 posted on 10/12/2008 7:44:41 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Ron H.

Just remember Ronald Reagan was born because Washington turned it’s back on responsible conservatism...Jimmy Carter? Lyndon Johnson?? Richard Nixon was no conservative Republican yet appeared very right of Johnson....Reagan won even though cheating in elections go on every election (1960 Illinois, Chicago Machine electing Kennedy)...on a landslide scale. You simply can’t cheat your way into victory IF the nation gives you a super mandate...and a TRUE conservative will win each and every time with the right conservative message.

What is insulting is how this limp spined congress acts embarrassed by conservatism. They have been bullied into submission by a mainstream media who has quieted their ideology and therefore quieted the movement all together. It does us no good if conservatism is alive and well in main street if we have no leaders willing to take up our cause.


65 posted on 10/12/2008 7:46:39 AM PDT by Illinois Rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus; All

Also the third party supporters..


66 posted on 10/12/2008 7:50:25 AM PDT by KevinDavis (McCain/Palin 08 Palin/Jindal 12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority

Another poster who exhibits wisdom and insightful lessons about Americans of today and what they have devolved into. I’d only add that after the war (the big one) people started moving out to the suburbs by the droves and told everyone else to not bother them with staying involved with Washington and local politics. They pretty soon developed a jaded view that their vote no longer mattered and they didn’t have time to vote anymore and they (and we) have finally arrived at that fatalistic and prophetic point in time. The Bible says that we shall reap what we sow.


67 posted on 10/12/2008 7:50:28 AM PDT by Ron H. (October 3, 2008 - the day we morphed into the 'United Socialist States of America')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: browardchad

It was just plain dumb of “conservative” Freddoso to publish this at this time.


68 posted on 10/12/2008 7:55:37 AM PDT by Rudder (That One, Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I agree. It was a massive stab-in-the-back. An “Et Tu Brutis” moment, if ever there was one, because, like you say, they went back on everything they said they were going to do.


69 posted on 10/12/2008 8:00:11 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
Everyone got scared when the market fell one day

Well, it fell even more after the bailout!

I heard David Dreier (that ---!) warning people: did you see what happened on "CNBC" - when we voted no!

Guess what, the market crashed anyway, even with this 700 billion dollar boondoggle. Has Dreier been his watching CNBC!?!

How do our leaders make choices, by whats on TV that afternoon?

Mccain could have won the election right there, by saying: Americans! Let's stand up against the fear, these frauds have no idea what they're talking about, they only know how to spend our money and that's the only way they know how to fix anything!!! And it never works!

70 posted on 10/12/2008 8:07:03 AM PDT by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
> As for having to fight the US military, please remember that when we raised our hand and took the oath when we joined the US military (for me, many, many years ago) our sworn allegiance was to the US Constitution: It was not to whatever party or administration happened to be in power.

You are absolutely right. That is why, I believe, the loyalty to the constitution is the first part of the oath, before even the president. Not only that, we are sworn to defend it against all enimies, both foriegn and domestic.


In the Armed Forces EXCEPT the National Guard (Army or Air)

I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.

In the National Guard (Army or Air)

I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the State of (STATE NAME) against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the Governor of (STATE NAME) and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to law and regulations. So help me God.

71 posted on 10/12/2008 8:08:41 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

You have FR mail.


72 posted on 10/12/2008 8:10:39 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (You have less than 3 weeks to be prepared for the worse. Get your guns and ammo, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Michigan Bowhunter

Fred quit before Louisiana had a chance to vote for him. I find it hard to forgive him for that.


73 posted on 10/12/2008 8:24:33 AM PDT by sportutegrl (0bi has been looking a little wan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fishrrman
Couple of other names I’d like to toss out: Salvador Allende Augusto Pinochet - John

Suharto.

When it all goes down, they will be very lucky to wind up with Pinochet.

74 posted on 10/12/2008 8:25:14 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When He rolls up His sleeves, He ain't just puttin' on the Ritz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Illinois Rep
What is insulting is how this limp spined congress acts embarrassed by conservatism. They have been bullied into submission by a mainstream media who has quieted their ideology and therefore quieted the movement all together. It does us no good if conservatism is alive and well in main street if we have no leaders willing to take up our cause.

While being no real booster of Rush I do enjoy listening to him talk about politics and his brand of conservatism and that is where I usually take issue with him much of the time but overall he does cause me to think for myself.

A real problem as I see it for Conservatives has been that we send so called quasi-Conservatives, aka moderate Republicans who sound and campaign as traditional Conservatives to Washington and expect them to deliver on their campaign promises to those who trusted and voted for them. We soon learn that they quickly get taken in by the allures that all powerful Washington elites are offering them and they all to quickly cross over to the dark-side. They succumb to the powers and riches they think they attain for playing ball. They soon find themselves doing things that they think will make them likable and acceptable to the true liberal elites there.

Rush used to say that much of the time a few years back, that too many moderate-leaning Republicans, aka RINO's are too busy trying to be liked by the liberal elites in Washington and in the media. That diseased thinking is what produced this RINO candidate that we have been saddled with today, IMHO. McCain used to be the darling of the media until the real thing came along and McCain soon found himself being the odd man out by those he sought to be friends with.

75 posted on 10/12/2008 8:33:22 AM PDT by Ron H. (October 3, 2008 - the day we morphed into the 'United Socialist States of America')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
Unfortunately, I agree with Freddoso.

I'm not giving up. I will vote for McCain/Palin no matter what happens between now and election day, but I'm not real optimistic at this point.

If Obama wins I hope Romney gives it another crack in 2012 and chooses Bobby Jindal as his running mate if he wins the nomination. The GOP need conservatives who are smart, articulate and fully capable of engaging Obama/Biden on the battlefield of ideas and policy.

Palin has her heart in the right place, but I don't think she will be a credible candidate for POTUS in four years. Maybe in another 8 years she will be ready, but she has to develop much greater fluency in all the subjects that a potential President would be expected to have command of. That means she has to apply herself and learn a lot more about national security, economics, the Supreme Court and a wide range of important domestic issues, including everything from illegal immigration to education and healthcare.

76 posted on 10/12/2008 8:37:06 AM PDT by Norman Arbuthnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
The GOP and RNC brought this calamity on themselves. McCain sqweaked by in the primaries with questionable crossover voting for him in Florida. His campaign was all but over last summer, yet, suddenly, he magically became the nominee. I'm not buying it. The GOP had at least two other primary candidates that deserved more support during the primaries and were left to hang out and dry. McCain was, is and never will be a conservative. His disdain for conservatives and conservatism is in front of everyone's face yet the unbridled fear of Obama masks it.

McCain brings Palin on to soothe the unwashed masses, then he flips back to his "bi-partisan" spring loaded position. Republicans are hell bent to fight and McCain can't/won't fight for the very people who support him. He's a sham and a scam artist every bit as much as Obama is. So, vote for him if it makes you feel warm and cozy because he's not as bad as Obama. I won't be. I'll write in Deputy Dawg before I vote for this fraud.

77 posted on 10/12/2008 8:40:10 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Put Palin in the White House. Send McCain to Sun City, AZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Yep. They are so busy trying to tackle our own quarterback to the ground in the last minutes of the game that they forget the impact of their stupidity on the outcome of the game.

Whine all you want, but once the cointoss is over, get your head in the game and keep it there.


78 posted on 10/12/2008 8:40:39 AM PDT by fightinJAG (Rush was right: You never win by losing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kleebo151

Exactly.


79 posted on 10/12/2008 8:41:09 AM PDT by fightinJAG (Rush was right: You never win by losing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Fatalists have definitely been out in force.

There is no reason whatsoever to give up now.


80 posted on 10/12/2008 8:43:44 AM PDT by fightinJAG (Rush was right: You never win by losing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson