While many of the things I brought up were positions that Mitt changed overnight, none of my points were criticisms of his flip-flops.
I pointed out his lies and deceitfulness, his fakery, his insincerity. Mitt will agree with whatever audience he is addressing regardless of any principles he may or may not hold.
I get the distinction. Some of them are arguable, but in any case I do not agree with your outrage. Politicians get called on false claims, and rightly so. Hillary in a hail of bullets comes to mind. Romney's missteps may have been significant, but they pale in comparison to his good record, leadership, and sincerity.
Mitt will agree with whatever audience he is addressing regardless of any principles he may or may not hold.
Romney has played differently to different audiences in different decades. Look, as a legitimate contender, he still needs to do politics. But largely he has been consistent in recent years, and seems certain to continue to be. Clearly, you disagree.