I get the distinction. Some of them are arguable, but in any case I do not agree with your outrage. Politicians get called on false claims, and rightly so. Hillary in a hail of bullets comes to mind. Romney's missteps may have been significant, but they pale in comparison to his good record, leadership, and sincerity.
Mitt will agree with whatever audience he is addressing regardless of any principles he may or may not hold.
Romney has played differently to different audiences in different decades. Look, as a legitimate contender, he still needs to do politics. But largely he has been consistent in recent years, and seems certain to continue to be. Clearly, you disagree.
“Romney has played differently to different audiences in different decades. “
No he hasn’t, he didn’t start mimicking the right until he started on this national campaign for President.
Even for this campaign he tried to smear his mother as a pre-Roe vs Wade, pro abortion champion in her 1970 Senate run, and Ronald Reagan as “adamantly pro-choice”.