Please read this.... It’s not about and never will be about what the actual answers are. It’s always about and always will be about how the answers are presented and represented in the media. My points are not about substance, McCain had the better answers, Obama wins on style and presentation.
If the debate was only on radio, McCain wins hands-down.
My family will be voting McCain and I’m glad you’ll be voting for McCain but undecided voters are swinging towards Obama, that is where style points count.
This election will come down to a few hundred voters in VA, PA and Ohio and will make 2000 look like 1972..
Personal insults are something that you should leave to the DUers, Freepers are supposed to be better than that.
Bur when Obama has done so bad that at least two MSM outlets are openly saying he *lost* (Des Moines Register, New York Post); when he has been publicly corrected by Henry Kissenger; when he says a number of times "I agree with John McCain"; when he says, "I haz a brzlet too, Its name is uhhh..." (LOLbama moment);
I don't think there is much to worry about.
Let's put it this way. When is the last time *you* can recall that a vice presidential candidate drew 60,000 people to wait for hours in the hot sun?
Or, one last.
Democrats PROJECT. Thus it was Ken Starr and not Bill Clinton who was fixated on sex; Republicans who will make us less safe; Barney Frank and Christopher Dodd who say Republicans' risky schemes cost people; and so on.
Given all that, what does it tell you that Obama is saying McCain might lose by a landslide?
Cheers!