Posted on 09/26/2008 7:53:08 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Words that give me pause:
Now let me tell you something very simple and very important: You can try to prevent a financial meltdown or you can teach Wall Street a lesson, but you cant do both at the same time.
So which will it be?
You say you want straight talk no spin, no bull, no sugar-coating. Okay, here goes.
First, stop fixating on Wall Street executives there will be time to deal with them later. Even if you clawed back every dime they made over the past decade, it would come to several billions of dollars. Thats a rounding error compared with the size of the financial problem were facing here.
Second, we need to act quickly. The financial situation is now downright scary. Dont look at the stock market thats not where the problem is. The problem is in the credit markets, which are quickly freezing. I wont bore you with technical indicators like Libor and Treasury swap spreads, but if you talk to people who work these markets every day, as I have, they report that the money markets are in worse shape than they were last August, or even during the currency crises of 1998.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net ...
False choice IMO. This bailout isn’t going to FIX anything. All it’s going to do and all it’s designed to do is hold things together until after the election.
Not to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but is it possible that this economic nightmare has been - at least in part - systematically orchestrated in such a way as to manipulate the rank and file middle-class citizens of the U.S. to embrace ever broadening socialist economic encroachments out of fear for their future financial security???
On the other hand, is there any difference between one economic system in which the means of production/capital are concentrated in the hands of a few “commissars” and another in which the means of production/capital are concentrated in the hands of a few laissez-faire capitalists/fascists?
It appears to me that in either case the means of production - as well as most of the profits - wind up being concentrated in the hands of an elite few while we rank and file middle class taxpayers continues to get screwed out of our hard-earned money.
We need to get back to a MODERATE (i.e. non-monopolistic) form of capitalism which allows for BOTH economic growth AND provisions for our less fortunate, needy citizens (i.e. elderly, disabled, etc.) while doing away with non-essential economy-crippling taxpayer-funded entitlements which morphed out of the socialist “politics of envy.”
See this:
J.P. Morgan says California home prices face further drop
***********************EXCERPT INTRO**********************
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- J.P. Morgan Chase , which late Thursday bought Washington Mutual said the peak-to-trough average home price in California could fall as much as 58% if the country enters a severe recession.
You're kidding, right?
Buffett's "time bomb" goes off on Wall Street
******************************Graph from post # 25.
****************************************
I posted this graph on another thread - Cox recently stated that Credit Default Swaps are now at $62 Trillion.
We may be toast.
So are we looking at CDS/derivatives as a major culprit?
Even more: you *should* do both. Doing the first without the second means applying a short term paliative. The economy is not the problem, it’s a consequence. Not punishing those responsible means not fixing the root causes.
Ouch.
They aren't worth $62 trillion and so what?
Thanks for the PING!, Ern!
Thanks Ernest.
And for the following, thanks LucyT:
Major “Earmark” in Democrat Bailout Agreement
(URGENT must read -ACORN and more)
Blogs 4 McCain | 25 September 2008 | Bill Smith
Posted on 09/26/2008 4:04:56 AM PDT by SE Mom
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2090926/posts
You’re welcome, SunkenCiv.
From the same thread, #112 added to your post.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2090926/posts?page=112#112
Nice little presentation.
“A properly constructed Stabilization Plan hopefully avoids the worst-case scenario. It should ultimately not cost the taxpayer much, and maybe even return a profit. The AIG rescue that Paulson arranged is an example of how to do it right. My bet is that the taxpayer is going to make a real profit on this deal. We got 80% of AIG, with what is now a loan paying the taxpayer over 12%, plus almost $2 billion in upfront fees for doing the loan. That is not a bailout. That is a business deal that sounds like it was done by Mack the Knife.”
Thanks for the ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.