[Texas Federalist]

Well, it was the cheapest of a cheap shots, and I am not going to let this go by without a challenge.

The reporter asked about incest in order to portray him as a fool. If they used an attack that wasn't patently absurd and vicious, it wouldn't portray the NY Times in such a bad light. Ironic huh?

[Checkers]

“The reporter asked about incest in order to portray him as a fool. If they used an attack that wasn't patently absurd and vicious, it wouldn't portray the NY Times in such a bad light. Ironic huh?”

Remember the stereotype of the uptight-conservatives-with-no-sense-of-humor?

Today's thread is Exhibit A.

[stripes1776]

The reporter asked about incest in order to portray him as a fool. If they used an attack that wasn't patently absurd and vicious, it wouldn't portray the NY Times in such a bad light. Ironic huh?

We must have had different experiences. I found the suggestion of incest so disgusting, that I didn't find much humor in the rest of the skit. I didn't need SNL to convince me that the NYT is biased.

I saw it as a cheap shot and the rest as mostly fluff to cover it up.

But to show you I am not totally devoid of humor, I liked the part about the polar bear. But then I really like polar bears.