Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Provenzo: Sarah Palin had a moral obligation to kill this baby!

1 posted on 09/18/2008 8:55:35 AM PDT by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Zakeet

There is a Prof Singer at Priceton that made the same case several years ago. Was cornered like a rat on campus by some students in wheelchairs shortly afterwards.


31 posted on 09/18/2008 9:10:52 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Fire the CIA and hire the Free Clinic, someone who knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet
A parent has a moral obligation to provide for his or her children until these children are equipped to provide for themselves. Because a person afflicted with Down syndrome is only capable of being marginally productive (if at all) and requires constant care and supervision, unless a parent enjoys the wealth to provide for the lifetime of assistance that their child will require, they are essentially stranding the cost of their child's life upon others.

The author's argument is equally applicable to members of the Welfare Class, but is unlikely to be so applied.

33 posted on 09/18/2008 9:11:11 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

It is good to have occasional reminders why we don’t want NAZI’s deciding who lives and dies, under socialized medicine.


34 posted on 09/18/2008 9:11:15 AM PDT by G Larry ("Disgust" is a valid expression!-Vote Family Values!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

I didn’t believe in reincarnation until now — because in this monstrous pissant, Joseph Mengele has apparently rejoined us.


36 posted on 09/18/2008 9:13:49 AM PDT by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet
Wow, when you read the statement and let it sink in, this jerk's statement begins to sound like the Philosophy of another great philanthropist.

It was called "The Final Solution."

These guys are scarey.

37 posted on 09/18/2008 9:14:04 AM PDT by R_Kangel (`.`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

“..suggests that Sarah Palin’s decision to give birth to a child with Down Syndrome, is a financial burden that others are forced to suffer with.”

The writer would be a high-ranking member of the SS in Hitler’s Germany.


39 posted on 09/18/2008 9:14:56 AM PDT by 353FMG (What marxism and fascism could not destroy, liberalism did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

I’m sure that Provenzo would have experienced a rare delight if it had been possible for him to abort Trig Palin himself.

Of course I suspect that Todd Palin would have acted appropriately and we would now be reading Provenzo’s obituary.

What a disgusting piece of inhuman sh*t this Provenzo is.


41 posted on 09/18/2008 9:16:01 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Real humans don’t make life and death decisions based solely on some elitist and extremist notion of “value”. This guy would have fit in well with the Nazis.


44 posted on 09/18/2008 9:17:51 AM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Too bad Nicholas’s Mother wasn’t a baby killer.


45 posted on 09/18/2008 9:18:28 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Obama prays to himself: "The prayer that I tell myself every night ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

There was a time when Objectivist writers would have deplored the system that places such a financial burden on others. Sarah Palin herself has no personal power to make us pay for the care of others. That’s the power of the welfare state.
Rand would not have been pleased by such intellectual slovenliness.


46 posted on 09/18/2008 9:18:40 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Where is Michelle Obama? Somewhere a campaign is missing its albatross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

If you cannot fill the needs of the State, you have no purpose!

Yeah, sign me up for that/sarc


47 posted on 09/18/2008 9:18:46 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Now you know why the needles on compasses point north - Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

By this guys thinking, Casey Anthony would be considered a hero.


48 posted on 09/18/2008 9:21:10 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet
‘Objectivist’ Writer: Trig Palin a Financial Burden Who Should Have Been Aborted

This so called 'objectivist' writer is a drain on society and should be aborted.

49 posted on 09/18/2008 9:21:25 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Not too surprising he appeared on Maher’s show. One, the scum of the earth and the other even worse.


50 posted on 09/18/2008 9:21:46 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet
Two questions, the first one serious...the second one not so serious:

1. Where do we draw the line, when deciding which humans to sacrifice for the greater good?

2. How high would unemployment go, if we had no need for helping professionals?

51 posted on 09/18/2008 9:26:08 AM PDT by syriacus (Calling humans "pigs" is second-nature for anti-war radicals, Black Panthers + radical Islamists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet
I remember former Alabama coach Gene Stallings talking about their Son who had Down Syndrome.

He said when they first found out, they were devastated. He then said the child had turned out to be a tremendous blessing to them. He said he was full of love and affection.

52 posted on 09/18/2008 9:26:19 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

This guys probably doesn’t like Bridget McCain either.....


53 posted on 09/18/2008 9:26:46 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Hitler felt the same way.


54 posted on 09/18/2008 9:28:25 AM PDT by popdonnelly (I'll tell you a little secret: we're smarter and more competent than the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Yes, my kids are a financial burden. So is the Federal government. Guess which one I would rather kill?


56 posted on 09/18/2008 9:31:02 AM PDT by popdonnelly (I'll tell you a little secret: we're smarter and more competent than the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Terribly false reasoning. Such zero sum logic is not “objectivist” but irrational, and in a manner common among the far left, whose axiom is always that all things must be rationed because all things are in critical shortage. In turn, critical shortage must always be assumed, because that is the only condition in which rationing makes sense.

Say there are two people with one apple. By leftist logic, they should divide the apple, under the assumption that it is the only apple. Even if it is pointed out that the two people with one apple are in a grocery store, next to a bin full of apples, then the leftist would assume that they don’t have enough money to get another apple.

If this is the case, then they would say that all money should be divided equally, so that both of these people will have an apple. And yet the grocery store is across the street from an apple orchard full of ripe apples, free for the taking. It doesn’t really matter that the person who doesn’t have an apple doesn’t like apples, or even if he is allergic to apples.

The bottom line is that the world has vast amounts of apples, yet the leftist is so narrow minded, and actually philosophically compelled to assume shortage and rationing, that they are incapable of accepting any other process than socialism.

To make matters worse, time and time again, socialism has proven that it can only, at the best of times, provide rotten and wormy apples, but eventually it will provide no apples, yet demand all the resources in the world to not provide apples.


60 posted on 09/18/2008 9:37:22 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson