[Titus-Maximus]

I saw that Allred fraud, some lawyer she is, any evidence that is illegally obtained is thrown out, period full stop. Poisoned fruit. How she can stand there and act as if this was a legitimate way to gather evidence shows you how partisan these people are - they cast off the most sacred tenets of their profession and our constitutional rights all to keep someone out of political power. It is disturbing and I hope these hackers are locked up. This was a disgusting, sickening invasion of privacy - but the Dem left should not surprise you - they had searched Judge Bork’s video store to find his rental list to try and embarrass his family. These are the same hypocrites that lecture us on an intrusive government - and look how they behave.

[MirrorField]

I saw that Allred fraud, some lawyer she is, any evidence that is illegally obtained is thrown out, period full stop. Poisoned fruit.

This would apply in normal legal process, but nobody aimed that way. The relevant forum here is not any US jurisdiction, but the Court of Public Opinion. In that jurisdiction no evidence is excluded, nothing can be retroactively excluded, nobody can order the jury to ignore anything and nobody is excluded from the jury on basis of information contamination. And the fact that there can be no legal process can be even more damning ("the bastard got away on technicality").

And the verdict will be cast in November 4th.

Palin was fortunate that the e-mail account contained nothing more compromising than few silly photos.