[mmichaels1970]

Well if it’s a fake like many say then they knew a lot of info to put it together, email addresses for the contact list, personal pictures (from an airplane taken of Bristol and Trig) that looks like cell phone camera quality....

I'd agree. I can't claim that it IS a fake. It may very well be real. Especially in light of Amy McCorkell supposedly confirming that one of the emails was legitimately from her. I just don't want to jump to any conclusions one way or the other until this plays out a bit.

The lack of a paperclip for the MMS message still bothers me though.

[Domandred]

The lack of a paperclip for the MMS message still bothers me though. I don't use my phone to send photos, but what happens if this is actually the tail end of texting going back and forth?

Lets say you take a picture and send it to email, then reply to the phone with the email, then use the phone to text message reply again. Subject header stays the same because it's a reply, but not sure if phone message replies append "RE:" to the front and also not sure if it keeps the original attachment.

Or maybe someone forgot to send the attachment...my wife does that a lot and has to send it again.