You know who usually files those lawsuits, don’t you? Parents. Parents who often, as in Dover, turn right around and vote out the school board who snuck creation in. But I guess parents’ wishes only count when they wish for the same thing you do.
BS!
Micheal Newdow was indeed a parent, but his daughter had no problem with ‘Under God’ in the pledge...he’s a slimy godless liberal lawyer angry at God, and THAT is his agenda.
The Georgia ACLU threatened our school board to remove the word Christmas from the school calendar, NO parents were made aware of these godless liberals hijacking the law.
Yes, with provisions for the protection of the rights of minorities.
>>>>>>But NOT at the exclusion of everyone else.
Communist societies are characterized by minorities taking their grievances to the court system for protection against the tyranny of the majority? Do tell.
>>>>>Tell us how Christmas in a school’s calendar is tyranny?
Tell us how offering an alternative THEORY for debate is tyranny.
And they’re NOT “taking their grievances to the court system”, they’re HIJACKING it.
Dover: eleven parents sued the school district. Georgia stickers: five parents sued the school district. metmom had framed the lawsuits about creationism in the classroom as a denial of parents' wishes; I was just pointing out that the lawsuits were, in fact, expressions of parents' wishes.
And you keep referring us to the Thomas More Law Center. I see that the main item on their Web site is a story about how they successfully filed a lawsuit against a school district on behalf of someone who wanted to mention God in the classroom. Do you have an intellectually consistent explanation for why that suit wasn't HIJACKING the court system, but those other two lawsuits were?