“My bad. When I saw how you related 5.4 to 2.1, I thought it was a stroke of genius for you to pull out that correlation.”
Had you going there for a second, eh?
I have yet to see proof that 2.1° or the ever so random 5.4° is in any way special.
0.125°
is a cool number. (How big 7.5' maps are...)
I'll have to dig up a screenshot of the moving map display program I wrote.
Re 1404:
“I will tell you as soon as you answer my questions on the definition of orbits.”
Well, orbits, also displayed as a | (aka, pipe) are used to do a logical OR on some bits.
Where A and B are the source and C is the result:
A: 10010101
B: 01010010
C: 11010111
Thats how a bitwise OR(orbits) works.
(I think I got that right...)
(snicker)
The fact is, your whole 'answer my question and then I'll answer yours' is what people who don't want to answer a question do.
It is also a fact that, if I wanted to find out about some crook, I would just go look it up on the net.
If you want to post some definitions on what it means to orbit an object, or to be orbited by an object, I won't be offended.
Then, if you want to post info about some Crook, you may.