Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Obama is Mum about Harvard
World Net Daily ^ | 9-11-08 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 09/11/2008 4:33:13 AM PDT by AmericaUnite

On the surface, at least, Barack Obama's single most impressive accomplishment has been his 1990 election to the presidency of the Harvard Law Review.

This position also provided Obama his only real executive experience as he supervised the law review's staff of 80 editors.

One has to wonder, then, why neither he nor wife Michelle emphasized this singular honor during the up-by-the-bootstraps biographical sections of their respective speeches in Denver.

In fact, neither of them so much as mentioned Obama's time at Harvard, this despite his vulnerability on the executive experience charge.

Their silence likely derives from one verifiable fact: Obama's record at Harvard was no more authentic than John Kerry's record in Vietnam.

Kerry was justifiably swift-boated because he fraudulently positioned himself as a war hero. Obama seems to have learned from Kerry.

In the age of the Internet, the less said about a dubious credential the better, and Obama's law presidency credential is dubious on any number of levels.

(Column continues below)

For starters, Obama did not do nearly well enough at his previous stop, Columbia University, to justify admission to Harvard Law.

According to the New York Sun, university spokesman Brian Connolly confirmed that Obama graduated in 1983 with a major in political science but without honors.

In the age of affirmative action and grade inflation, a minority in a relatively easy major like political science had to under-perform dramatically to avoid minimal honors. Obama apparently did just that.

The specifics we may never know. As the New York Times concedes, Obama "declined repeated requests to talk about his New York years, release his Columbia transcript or identify even a single fellow student, co-worker, roommate or friend from those years."

Would that Bristol Palin could get off so easily!

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: almansour; cashill; harvardlawreview; obama; obamabiden; obamatruthfile; saudiprince
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

ACTIVIST IN CHICAGO NOW HEADS HARVARD LAW REVIEW
Chicago Tribune - February 7, 1990
Author: Michael J. Ybarra.
Just a few years ago, Barack Obama was helping residents of the Altgeld

Gardens housing development challenge the Chicago Housing Authority over

asbestos in their apartments.

On Monday, the 28-year-old Obama was named president of the Harvard Law

Review, the nation`s most prestigious student legal journal. Obama is the

first black elected to the post in its 104-year history.

The Review is considered one of the most authoritative of the law school

reviews and is a forum for judges and scholars. It is also a high-powered

springboard for aspiring lawyers. Its presidents usually go on serve as a

clerk for a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for a year and then as a clerk for an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.

It took 91 years to elect a woman, and it wasn`t until last year that an

Asian was elected by his fellow editors to the position.

For Obama , it`s another victory in the fight against ``powerlessness.``

``People don`t feel that they can have much impact,`` he said in a phone

interview from the Review`s offices. ``I want to get people involved in having a say in how their lives are run. More and more of that needs to be done.``

As executive director of the Developing Communities Project, he had

attempted to persuade the residents of Altgeld Gardens to become more involved in their community. Obama worked for the Developing Communities Project for

four years.

(snip)

``Unbelievable talent is not cultivated; a lot of time it`s crushed,``

Obama said. ``Over the long run, the way to improve the conditions in the

cities and schools-to fight crime and drugs-is to work on the local level.``

To do that effectively, Obama said he wanted to know how the system works as only a lawyer can. To that end, he said he`ll spend a couple of years

practicing law after graduation next year and then it`s most likely back to

community organizing, maybe politics.

Probably back where he started.

``I`ll definitely be coming back to Chicago,`` he said. ``Chicago`s a

great town . . . an ideal laboratory.``


41 posted on 09/11/2008 6:55:50 AM PDT by maggief (Read my lip-stick!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: saganite

The Obama history just becomes murkier and murkier. The more I hear about this guy the more I’m convinced he’s been “groomed” for what he’s doing now.”

Think Goerge Soros.....

Nobama still hasn’t managed to come forth with a valid birth certificate, either. That’s plenty murky for me.


42 posted on 09/11/2008 7:00:35 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: palomonte
Biden graduated in the bottom third of his law school class at the (I think) internationally acclaimed University of Scranton.

Not quite. According to a 1987 New York Times Article, Biden graduated number 76 out of 85 from Syracuse University School of Law, which puts him at the cusp of the bottom 10% of his class. This was after he was allowed to retake a course in which he received and "F" for plagiarism. According to the same article, Biden earned mostly C's and D's as an undergraduate at the University of Delaware, except for two A's in physical education and an F in ROTC.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DE3DB143FF93BA2575AC0A961948260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print

I agree that academic achievement is seldom a good measure for predicting leadership and success as POTUS. Nevertheless, the left wing and their comrades in the MSM have bashed President Bush for the last eight years as being "dumb," "stupid," and "an idiot" because he earned mostly C's and B's at Yale, even thought he has an MBA from Harvard. If academic achievement is significant when reviewing President Bush's qualifications, then it ought to be equally significant when considering Barry's and Biden's qualifications.

43 posted on 09/11/2008 7:23:46 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Thank you for the corrections - my overall characterization of Biden as a less than stellar student still stands, which was my point.

I think the main point of the thread is the question of whether Obama is hiding MORE than a poor academic record - I got off track a bit - I apologize for that.


44 posted on 09/11/2008 7:34:25 AM PDT by palomonte (the universe tends to unfold as it should)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: palomonte

No need to apologise. The bottom line is that until Barry releases his complete academic records including SAT/ACT scores and proves othrwise, I am going to assume that neither Columbia nor Harvard would have accepted him if not for the fact that he is half black, just as I assume that Yale and Harvard would not have accepted GWB if not for the fact that he is a legatee.


45 posted on 09/11/2008 7:49:29 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

I agree with your assumption - I don’t think there is any question that he would not have been admitted to any Ivy League institution on the basis of fair competition.


46 posted on 09/11/2008 7:54:55 AM PDT by palomonte (the universe tends to unfold as it should)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnite
The specifics we may never know. As the New York Times concedes, Obama "declined repeated requests to talk about his New York years, release his Columbia transcript or identify even a single fellow student, co-worker, roommate or friend from those years."

Would that Bristol Palin could get off so easily!

Needs to be repeated often.This is weird to just about anyone I tell it to.

47 posted on 09/11/2008 8:01:52 AM PDT by zeugma (Mark Steyn For Global Dictator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnite
Why Obama is Mum about Harvard

Gad...if Obama simply soft-pedals his close ties to Bill Ayers...
he must be REALLY afraid to have his Harvard career closely scrutinized!
48 posted on 09/11/2008 8:05:41 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
They worked hard, and they figured out what the teacher wanted. That's wonderful, but it isn't necessarily the only thing that a law school or an executive position requires.

It's telling, then, that in addition to not having these things, Barack doesn't have anything else that a law school or an executive position requires. On a U of C note, I know one undergrad from Hong Kong who finished in 2 years.
49 posted on 09/11/2008 8:07:28 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnite

Jack Cashill BUMP!
This guy is consistently good.


50 posted on 09/11/2008 8:14:08 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
one of the few presidents of this prestigious journal who never published an article.

Have there been *any* other presidents of the Law Review who published nothing?

51 posted on 09/11/2008 8:16:25 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
I am sure the transcripts would show Obama getting a C in Intro to Sociology while McCain an Sarah received A’s in Physics and Chemistry,

Biden's would show an "F" for getting caught for plagarizing.

52 posted on 09/11/2008 8:20:20 AM PDT by E=MC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnite

Aren’t the Columbia years the years Obama describes as having lived “like a monk?”

That increasingly strikes me as odd: “nope, nothing to see here, I was living in a cloister—left no fingerprints anywhere—but take my word for it, I was there.”


53 posted on 09/11/2008 8:28:32 AM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
Would it be racist to "shroud" Obama?

-PJ

54 posted on 09/11/2008 8:33:04 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (You can never over-estimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: saganite
The Obama history just becomes murkier and murkier. The more I hear about this guy the more I’m convinced he’s been “groomed” for what he’s doing now.

Obama appears to be a front man for several entities, mostly the Chicago Establishment, but with some possible connections to the Saudis.

And still the media declines to investigate his connection to Ayers, Khalid al-Masour, Rezko and Auchi

55 posted on 09/11/2008 8:39:54 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aShepard

I graduated from HS in the mid 70s. I had a single mom who was earning so little that I qualified for 100% financial aid. I went to college in the late 70s entirely pd for by grants, student loans, work study, and part time employment.

I have 4 points to make for comparison.

1) I was limited to where I could go to school, especially “out of state”. An Ivy League school was not possible. Also, keep in mind that Harvard required an application to get an application, at least for their undergrads.

2) There was no financial aid available for grad school. “Someone” would have had to pay for me to go.

3) When Reagan got in office in 80, there were even more restrictions put on available financial aid.

4) Lastly, I would have never had enough money to do drugs even if I wanted to. I could barely afford beer in those days. LOL

I have been suspicious of his ed background from the get go.
There is no difference between what I was offered and what he should have been offered. There is NO doubt that he had an idividual(s) sponsoring him.


56 posted on 09/11/2008 8:44:01 AM PDT by del4hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: palomonte

Unlike you many people are interested in whether Obama got in due to affirmative action. Obama has zero slave blood. It’s ridiculous for him to get affirmative action benefits since “his people” (Kenyans) never suffered from slavery or discrimination here


57 posted on 09/11/2008 9:44:47 AM PDT by dennisw (Never bet on a false prophet! ::::::|::::: Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

I think affirmative action is ridiculous in any case - slave blood or not.


58 posted on 09/11/2008 9:49:41 AM PDT by palomonte (see the light or feel the heat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: wildbill

Yeah but how does someone with no slave blood get on the affirmative action gravy train?


59 posted on 09/11/2008 9:49:49 AM PDT by dennisw (Never bet on a false prophet! ::::::|::::: Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
You also have to consider the periods in which the candidates were educated and the colleges they attended. The military academies are academically rigorous, and in the era that Joe Biden and John McCain attended college, so were the Ivy League colleges. But Biden attended the University of Delaware at Newark and finished in the bottom one-quarter of his class. McCain likely has the edge here. By the period Sarah Palin and Barack Obama went to college, academic standards had declined seriously from where they had been in the 1960s. Barack Obama is an Ivy League graduate, but also an affirmative action beneficiary. Judging by his malapropisms and incoherence away from a teleprompter, gaffes which make Dan Quayle look like a modern day Cicero or Quintilian, Obama is not a well educated man, even in the superficial sense that Bill Clinton or John Kennedy were. Sarah Palin is still an unknown, but appears promising. However, her skills are likely mostly from life experience rather than formal academics.
60 posted on 09/11/2008 9:54:03 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson