[RichInOC]

Given the hysteria some of these hags have gone into over Sarah and Bristol Palin choosing to have their children when it might be more personally convenient for them not to, I find all the lathering about “reproductive rights”, “reproductive choice”, and “the right of the woman to choose” to be...what’s the phrase I’m looking for?...ah, yes...phony outrage. Not to mention, so Orwellian that even the Ministry of Truth might have blanched at it.

[MrB]

If you’re confused as to why they are so outraged at someone choosing to have their kids, here’s the reason:

Those who have had abortions cannot afford to have their consciences prodded by any indication of the wrongness of abortion.

If abortion has ANY negative connotations, it logically leads to the fact that they killed their own baby, a human being, and whose psyche could withstand that acknowledgement?

Notice that the DNC Platform removed the words “safe, legal, and RARE” because the “rare” word implies that there is something negative about it.

I think back to a time when I saw a relative give the finger to a pro-life billboard, and it seemed weird to me at the time. It makes perfect sense in light of my understanding, now, though.